cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%26lt%3Bmeta%20http-equiv%3D%22Content-Type%22%20content%3D%22text%2Fhtml%3B%20charset%3DUTF-8%22%20%2F%26gt%3B%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22font-size%3A%2012pt%3B%22%3EEstimados%2C%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22font-size%3A%2012pt%3B%22%3ESoy%20bastante%20nuevo%20en%20el%20uso%20de%3CSTRONG%3E%20JMP%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20software%2C%20y%20por%20lo%20que%20puedo%20ver%2C%20no%20hay%20ninguna%20funci%C3%B3n%20en%20el%20programa%20para%20usar%20el%3CSTRONG%3E%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%3F%20Tengo%20una%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20no%20normal%20de%20mis%20diferentes%20conjuntos%20de%20valores%20(m%C3%A1s%20de%20tres%20grupos)%20y%20estoy%20optando%20por%20una%3CSTRONG%3E%20prueba%20no%20param%C3%A9trica%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20.%20Es%20decir%2C%20me%20gustar%C3%ADa%20probar%20un%20tipo%20de%20prueba%20de%202%20v%C3%ADas%20(como%20ANOVA).%20%3CSTRONG%3Eprueba%20de%20wilcoxon%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20es%20insuficiente%20ya%20que%20es%20una%20prueba%20unidireccional.%20%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22font-size%3A%2012pt%3B%22%3E%C2%BFAlguien%20sabe%20c%C3%B3mo%20solucionar%C3%A9%20este%20problema%3F%20%C2%BFExiste%20alguna%20otra%20prueba%20que%20realizar%20en%20lugar%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%3F%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22font-size%3A%2012pt%3B%22%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-108453%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-108453%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ES%C3%AD%2C%20una%20limitaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20y%20de%20CUALQUIER%20prueba%20con%20bloqueo%20es%20que%20la%20variable%20de%20bloqueo%20no%20interact%C3%BAa%20con%20el%20factor.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EPara%20ampliar%20esto%2C%20supongamos%20que%20tiene%2010%20bloques%20y%203%20tratamientos.%20Con%20el%20enfoque%20de%20Friedman%2C%20est%C3%A1s%20calculando%20rangos%20dentro%20de%20cada%20bloque.%20Los%20rangos%20dentro%20de%20cada%20bloque%20siempre%20sumar%C3%A1n%206.%20Por%20lo%20tanto%2C%20cuando%20realices%20la%20prueba%20no%20habr%C3%A1%20ninguna%20diferencia%20entre%20los%20bloques%20(las%20sumas%20de%20los%20cuadrados%20ser%C3%A1n%200%20para%20el%20efecto%20de%20bloque).%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESi%20S%C3%8D%20realiz%C3%B3%20una%20interacci%C3%B3n%20(que%20podr%C3%ADa%20probar%20dentro%20de%20JMP%2C%20solo%20necesita%20usar%20Ajustar%20modelo%20en%20lugar%20de%20Ajustar%20Y%20por%20X)%2C%20tendr%C3%ADa%209%20DF%20para%20los%20bloques%2C%202%20DF%20para%20el%20tratamiento%20y%2018%20DF%20para%20el%20interacci%C3%B3n.%20Te%20quedan%200%20DF%20por%20error.%20Tiene%20un%20modelo%20saturado%20y%20no%20habr%C3%A1%20pruebas%20disponibles.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-108445%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-108445%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EMe%20doy%20cuenta%20de%20que%20esta%20es%20una%20discusi%C3%B3n%20antigua%2C%20pero%20la%20encontr%C3%A9%20de%20gran%20ayuda.%20He%20podido%20implementarlo%20con%20%C3%A9xito%20pero%20tengo%20la%20siguiente%20pregunta%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPara%20evaluar%20el%20impacto%20de%20ambas%20variables%20en%20la%20variable%20de%20resultado%2C%20supongo%20que%20se%20deben%20probar%20cada%20una%20por%20separado%2C%20utilizando%20rangos%20creados%20usando%20ambas%2C%20pero%20altern%C3%A1ndolas%20entre%20roles%20de%20bloqueo%20y%20dependientes.%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20%C2%BFc%C3%B3mo%20se%20determina%20la%20interacci%C3%B3n%20entre%20estas%20dos%20variables%3F%20Afortunadamente%20pude%20transformar%20mis%20datos%20con%20%C3%A9xito%20y%20realizar%20un%20ANOVA%20bidireccional%20utilizando%20la%20plataforma%20Fit%20Model.%20%C2%BFEs%20esta%20una%20limitaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-56821%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-56821%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%20Maria%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETe%20refieres%20a%20usar%20Fit%20Model%20para%20rangos%20para%20realizar%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20RM.%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20en%20las%20%C3%BAltimas%20publicaciones%20vi%20usar%20Fit%20Y%20by%20X%20para%20calcular%20los%20bloques.%20Quiz%C3%A1s%20necesito%20hacerlo%20primero%20y%20luego%20ir%20a%20Fit%20Model.%20Seg%C3%BAn%20tengo%20entendido%2C%20RM%20solo%20se%20puede%20evaluar%20en%20el%20modelo%20de%20ajuste.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGracias.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-56762%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-56762%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EUna%20vez%20que%20tenga%20los%20rangos%2C%20esencialmente%20estar%C3%A1%20realizando%20medidas%20repetidas%20en%20los%20rangos%2C%20por%20lo%20que%20estar%C3%A1%20transformando%20los%20datos%20y%20realizando%20el%20an%C3%A1lisis%20RM%20en%20los%20rangos.%20Eso%20es%20b%C3%A1sicamente%20lo%20que%20hace%20una%20prueba%20de%20Friedmans%20bajo%20el%20cap%C3%B3.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-56760%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-56760%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%20Maria%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGracias%20por%20tu%20respuesta%20y%20enlace.%20Ech%C3%A9%20un%20vistazo%20a%20esas%20publicaciones%2C%20pero%20seg%C3%BAn%20entend%C3%AD%20ese%20problema%20no%20se%20refer%C3%ADa%20a%20un%20dise%C3%B1o%20de%20medidas%20repetidas%2C%20%C2%BFverdad%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECuando%20nos%20enfrentamos%20a%20un%20dise%C3%B1o%20de%20medidas%20repetidas%2C%20por%20lo%20general%2C%20los%20procedimientos%20estad%C3%ADsticos%20cambian%20debido%20a%20la%20peculiaridad%20de%20ese%20dise%C3%B1o.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJeff%20(%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F6878%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20%40Jeff_Perkinson%3C%2FA%3E%20)%2C%20%C2%BFtiene%20alguna%20sugerencia%20para%20solucionar%20este%20problema%2C%20por%20favor%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMuchas%20gracias.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-56754%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-56754%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHice%20la%20misma%20pregunta%20y%20el%20soporte%20de%20JMP%20respondi%C3%B3%20esto%2C%20lo%20cual%20funciona%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EJMP%20tiene%20muchas%20pruebas%20no%20param%C3%A9tricas%20integradas.%20La%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20no%20est%C3%A1%20disponible%20directamente%20en%20JMP%2C%20pero%20puede%20transformar%20sus%20datos%20en%20rangos%20en%20JMP%20para%20crear%20esta%20prueba%20simplemente%20como%20un%20ANOVA%20bidireccional%20en%20los%20rangos%20(usando%20el%20factor%20de%20bloqueo%20y%20el%20otro%20factor%20como%20dos%20factores%20aditivos).%20Hay%20un%20blog%20sobre%20esto%20(y%20argumentando%2C%20al%20final%2C%20por%20qu%C3%A9%20es%20posible%20que%20no%20quieras%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20algunos%20casos)%20aqu%C3%AD%3A%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FDiscussions%2FFriedman-test-on-JMP%2Ftd-p%2F5974%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FDiscussions%2FFriedman-test-on-JMP%2Ftd-p%2F5974%3C%2FA%3E%3CSPAN%3E%20.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EEs%20un%20problema%20si%20tienes%20v%C3%ADnculos%2C%20por%20lo%20que%20puede%20que%20tus%20datos%20no%20sean%20normales%20en%20primer%20lugar.%20La%20gente%20a%20menudo%20olvida%20que%2C%20aunque%20las%20pruebas%20no%20param%C3%A9tricas%20no%20asumen%20que%20los%20datos%20sean%20normales%2C%20estas%20pruebas%20todav%C3%ADa%20tienen%20suposiciones.%20Espero%20que%20esto%20haya%20ayudado%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-56753%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-56753%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%BFC%C3%B3mo%20puedo%20ejecutar%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20para%20un%20dise%C3%B1o%20de%20medidas%20repetidas%2C%20por%20favor%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ED%C3%A9jame%20saber%20los%20procedimientos%20de%20paso.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGracias.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-33914%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-33914%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EEsto%20fue%20muy%20%C3%BAtil%2C%20pero%20cuando%20eleg%C3%AD%20guardar%20rangos%2C%20solo%20tengo%20aproximadamente%20la%20mitad%20de%20mis%20datos%20que%20tienen%20un%20rango.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5986%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5986%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMe%20temo%20que%20no.%20Dej%C3%A9%20la%20prueba%20hace%20alg%C3%BAn%20tiempo.%20Pero%20puedo%20volver%20a%20investigarlo%2C%20ya%20que%20pronto%20tendr%C3%A9%20algunos%20datos%20nuevos%20que%20ser%C3%A1n%20analizados%20estad%C3%ADsticamente.%20Actualizar%C3%A9%20sobre%20este%20tema%20si%20Friedman%20vuelve%20a%20ser%20de%20inter%C3%A9s.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJim%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5985%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5985%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ETambi%C3%A9n%20recibo%20el%20error%20%22Se%20ignor%C3%B3%20el%20bloqueo%20porque%20el%20recuento%20de%20celdas%20era%20desigual%22%20cuando%20intento%20hacer%20un%20ANOVA%20simple%2C%20a%20pesar%20de%20que%20todos%20mis%20bloques%20tienen%20el%20mismo%20n%C3%BAmero%20de%20observaciones.%C2%BFAlguna%20vez%20pudiste%20resolver%20esto%3F%C2%A1Gracias!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5984%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5984%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Hola%20de%20nuevo!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ES%C3%AD%2C%20finalmente%20he%20dejado%20de%20lado%20las%20pruebas.%20Puede%20que%20m%C3%A1s%20adelante%20pruebe%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%2C%20pero%20en%20SPSS.%20Un%20colega%20m%C3%ADo%20me%20dijo%20que%20est%C3%A1%20intentando%20realizar%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20SPSS.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPero%20gracias%20por%20toda%20la%20ayuda%20y%20los%20buenos%20consejos.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJim%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5983%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5983%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EAbandonar%3CSPAN%20style%3D%22text-decoration%3A%20underline%3B%22%3E%3CSTRONG%3E%20AHORA%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20en%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman.S%C3%B3lo%20se%20aplica%20cuando%20hay%20igual%20n%C3%BAmero%20de%20observaciones%20en%20cada%20bloque.Pi%C3%A9nselo%3A%20considere%20dos%20bloques%2C%20uno%20con%20cinco%20observaciones%20y%20otro%20con%20diez.La%20media%20del%20primer%20bloque%20es%203%2C%20la%20del%20segundo%205%2C5.%20Autom%C3%A1ticamente%20tienes%20una%20diferencia%2C%20por%20lo%20que%20la%20hip%C3%B3tesis%20nula%20no%20puede%20ser%20cierta%2C%20por%20lo%20que%20cualquier%20valor%20de%20p%20es%2C%20bueno%2C%20falso.Esto%20significa%20que%20no%20puedes%20simplemente%20clasificar%2C%20transformar%20tus%20datos%20por%20bloque%20y%20obtener%20algo%20significativo.JMP%20le%20protege%20de%20hacer%20esto%20y%20emite%20el%20mensaje%20de%20error.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%C3%AD%20que%20es%20hora%20de%20detenerse%20y%20reconsiderar%20su%20enfoque%20de%20an%C3%A1lisis.Dices%20que%20tienes%20datos%20anormales.Puede%20ser%2C%20pero%20los%20supuestos%20de%20ANOVA%20son%20que%20los%20errores%20se%20distribuyen%20normalmente.%C2%BFLos%20has%20examinado%3F%C2%BFC%C3%B3mo%20se%20ve%20la%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20de%20errores%3F%C2%BFEs%20susceptible%20de%20transformaci%C3%B3n%3FProbablemente%20sea%20hora%20de%20consultar%20con%20alguien%20cara%20a%20cara%20para%20intentar%20responder%20estas%20preguntas.Luego%2C%20se%20puede%20dise%C3%B1ar%20un%20plan%20de%20an%C3%A1lisis%20apropiado.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5982%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5982%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Hola%20de%20nuevo!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGracias.%20Desafortunadamente%2C%20todav%C3%ADa%20no%20lo%20he%20solucionado.%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20tal%20vez%20necesite%20rehacer%20los%20rangos%20(an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20para%20guardar%20rangos)%2C%20ya%20que%20cuando%20ejecuto%20Fit%20y%20by%20x-analyses%20aparece%20una%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20que%20dice%20%22Se%20ignor%C3%B3%20el%20bloqueo%20porque%20el%20recuento%20de%20celdas%20no%20era%20igual%22.%20Despu%C3%A9s%20de%20eso%2C%20exclu%C3%AD%20algunas%20r%C3%A9plicas%20que%20conten%C3%ADan%20algunas%20celdas%20vac%C3%ADas%20pensando%20que%20esta%20podr%C3%ADa%20ser%20la%20raz%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20desigualdad%2C%20las%20guard%C3%A9%20como%20rangos%20y%20las%20ejecut%C3%A9%20en%20forma%20y%20por%20x%2C%20pero%20la%20desigualdad%20a%C3%BAn%20permanece%20y%20la%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20aparece%20nuevamente).%20%C2%BFPodr%C3%ADa%20ser%20que%20hay%20algunas%20especies%20que%20tienen%206%20r%C3%A9plicas%20y%20ahora%20algunas%20tienen%205%20r%C3%A9plicas%3F%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20todas%20las%20r%C3%A9plicas%20son%20iguales%20en%20n%C3%BAmero%20de%20muestras%20tratadas%20(es%20decir%2C%20control%20y%20tratadas).%20%C2%BFEsto%20plantea%20un%20problema%20para%20realizar%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEn%20mis%20ejecuciones%20de%20Fit%20y%20by%20x%20utilic%C3%A9%2C%20en%20el%20modelo%20de%20especificaci%C3%B3n%2C%20los%20valores%20de%20rasgo%20como%20respuesta%20Y%2C%20y%20el%20tratamiento%20y%20n%C3%BAmero%20de%20bloque%20para%20el%20factor%20X%20y%20el%20bloque.%20Incluso%20cambi%C3%A9%20el%20tratamiento%20y%20el%20n%C3%BAmero%20de%20bloque%20para%20esas%20dos%20especificaciones.%20Pero%20adem%C3%A1s%20de%20recibir%20el%20signo%20de%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20mencionado%20anteriormente%2C%20no%20mostr%C3%B3%20ning%C3%BAn%20dato%20ni%20relevancia%20(valores%20p%20de%20ANOVA%20bidireccional%2C%20por%20ejemplo).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETambi%C3%A9n.%20Hasta%20ahora.%20El%20archivo%20de%20salida%20resultante%20no%20muestra%20(nunca)%20ning%C3%BAn%20dato%20ANOVA%20bidireccional%2C%20sino%20que%20el%20archivo%20de%20salida%20(como%20siempre)%20tiene%20el%20t%C3%ADtulo%20ANOVA%20unidireccional.%20%C2%BFC%C3%B3mo%20puede%20saber%20exactamente%20si%20su%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20se%20muestra%20o%20no%20en%20el%20archivo%20de%20salida%3F%20No%20creo%20que%20haya%20un%20t%C3%ADtulo%20que%20diga%2C%20por%20ejemplo%2C%20ANOVA%20bidireccional%20no%20param%C3%A9trico%20en%20el%20ajuste%20de%20salida%20y%20por%20x.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESi%20alguien%20tiene%20alguna%20idea%20sobre%20esto%2C%20%C2%A1escr%C3%ADbanos%20una%20o%20dos%20l%C3%ADneas!%20No%20me%20rendir%C3%A9%20con%20este%20(todav%C3%ADa).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJim%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3E%3CSPAN%20lang%3D%22es-ES%22%20style%3D%22color%3A%20%23575757%3B%20line-height%3A%20115%25%3B%20font-family%3A%20'Times%20New%20Roman'%2C'serif'%3B%20font-size%3A%2012pt%3B%20mso-fareast-font-family%3A%20'Times%20New%20Roman'%3B%20mso-ansi-language%3A%20EN%3B%20mso-fareast-language%3A%20EN-US%3B%20mso-bidi-language%3A%20AR-SA%3B%22%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5981%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5981%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Oye!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGracias%20por%20toda%20la%20ayuda.%20Me%20meter%C3%A9%20en%20el%20asunto%20y%20espero%20poder%20solucionarlo%20pronto.%20Volver%C3%A9%20con%20algunos%20resultados%20que%20espero%20sean%20exitosos.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPerd%C3%B3n%20por%20responder%20tarde%2C%20estoy%20ocupado%20con%20algunos%20trabajos%20de%20laboratorio.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJim%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5980%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5980%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%20Jim%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDebe%20especificar%20su%20variable%20de%20bloqueo%20en%20la%20funci%C3%B3n%20Bloquear%20en%20el%20cuadro%20de%20di%C3%A1logo%20Ajustar%20Y%20por%20X%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%222757_FitYbyXBlock.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20717px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%222757_FitYbyXBlock.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%222757_FitYbyXBlock.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F100iEB77641D90B7E6C7%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%222757_FitYbyXBlock.png%22%20alt%3D%222757_FitYbyXBlock.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-Jeff%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5979%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5979%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EPara%20X%2C%20debe%20especificar%20tanto%20el%20tratamiento%20como%20el%20bloqueo%20(pero%20no%20su%20interacci%C3%B3n)%20para%20obtener%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5978%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5978%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EMuchas%20gracias%20Jeff.%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20no%20estoy%20seguro%20de%20haber%20encontrado%20lo%20que%20busco%3A%20ANOVA%20de%202%20v%C3%ADas.%20Parece%20que%20al%20final%20recibo%20solo%20datos%20ANOVA%20unidireccionales%20en%20el%20archivo%20de%20salida.%20Esto%20es%20lo%20que%20hice%3A%20primero%2C%20realic%C3%A9%20an%C3%A1lisis%20de%20distribuci%C3%B3n%20y%20clasifiqu%C3%A9%20los%20datos%20transformados%20de%20uno%20de%20los%20rasgos%20que%20he%20estudiado%20(Y)%20de%20acuerdo%20con%20su%20dise%C3%B1o%20de%20bloques%20aleatorios%2C%20es%20decir%2C%20bloques%20(By).%20Los%20datos%20se%20guardaron%20como%20rangos%20(seis%20datos%20de%20rango%2Fbloque%20compilados%20en%20una%20columna%20de%20la%20hoja%20de%20datos%20de%20Jmp)%20y%20luego%20analic%C3%A9%20el%20rasgo%20transformado%20por%20rango%20con%20Ajustar%20Y%20por%20X%3A%20Y%20como%20datos%20de%20rango%2C%20y%20para%20XI%20utilic%C3%A9%20el%20tratamiento%20como%20variable.%20.%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20en%20el%20archivo%20de%20salida%20solo%20veo%20datos%20ANOVA%20unidireccionales.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%BFSe%20ha%20llevado%20a%20cabo%20de%20manera%20incorrecta%3F%20%C2%BFO%20los%20datos%20se%20encontrar%C3%A1n%20en%20alg%C3%BAn%20lugar%20dentro%20del%20archivo%20de%20salida%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Agradecido%20por%20los%20aportes%20en%20este%20asunto!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJim%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5977%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5977%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%20Jim%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELa%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20no%20es%20compatible%20directamente%20con%20JMP%20pero%2C%20como%20se%C3%B1ala%20Steve%2C%20puede%20hacerlo%20calculando%20los%20rangos%20dentro%20de%20cada%20bloque%20y%20luego%20haciendo%20un%20ANOVA%20bidireccional%20en%20los%20rangos%20usando%20Fit%20Y%20by%20X%20(tratando%20uno%20de%20los%20efectos%20como%20una%20variable%20de%20bloqueo)%20.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECalcular%20los%20rangos%20dentro%20del%20bloque%20es%20f%C3%A1cil%20en%20JMP.%20Simplemente%20use%20la%20plataforma%20de%20Distribuci%C3%B3n%20con%20su%20respuesta%20original%20como%20Y%20y%20su%20variable%20de%20bloqueo%20como%20Por%20variable.%20Luego%2C%20en%20el%20informe%20resultante%2C%20mantenga%20presionada%20la%20tecla%20Ctrl%20y%20haga%20clic%20en%20el%20peque%C3%B1o%20tri%C3%A1ngulo%20rojo%20en%20la%20parte%20superior%20de%20uno%20de%20los%20histogramas%20y%20elija%20Guardar-%26gt%3BClasificaciones.%20Obtendr%C3%A1%20una%20nueva%20columna%20en%20su%20tabla%20de%20datos%20con%20los%20rangos%20dentro%20de%20los%20niveles%20de%20su%20variable%20de%20bloqueo.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1Espero%20que%20eso%20ayude!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-Jeff%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5976%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5976%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EGracias%20por%20la%20ayuda.%20Aunque%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20no%20parece%20aparecer%20en%20el%20men%C3%BA%20de%20JMP%20ni%20en%20ninguna%20otra%20parte%20del%20programa.%20Quiz%C3%A1s%20necesite%20realizarlo%20en%20SAS%20si%20JMP%20no%20realiza%20estas%20pruebas.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAtentamente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJim%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5975%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20%C2%BFPrueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20JMP%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5975%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESi%20no%20puede%20encontrar%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20en%20los%20men%C3%BAs%20(y%20no%20tengo%20idea%20de%20si%20puede%20o%20no%2C%20ya%20que%20no%20soy%20un%20usuario%20de%20JMP)%2C%20puede%20clasificar%2C%20transformar%20sus%20datos%20y%20usar%20un%20ANOVA%20de%20dos%20v%C3%ADas%20en%20las%20clasificaciones.%20.En%20SAS%2C%20esto%20est%C3%A1%20disponible%20en%20PROC%20FREQ%2C%20por%20lo%20que%20consultar%C3%ADa%20la%20documentaci%C3%B3n%20de%20JMP%20para%20conocer%20la%20posibilidad%20de%20realizar%20la%20prueba%20de%20Friedman%20de%20esa%20manera.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
beginners_luck
Level II

Friedman test on JMP?

Dear all,

I am fairly new in using the JMP software, and as far as I can see there is no function in the programme for using the Friedman test? I have a non-normal distribution of my different sets of values (more than three groups) and is opting for a non-parametric test. That is, I had like to test a 2-way type of test (as ANOVA). Wilcoxon test is insufficient since it is a one-way test.

Do anybody know how I will deal with is problem? Is there another test to perform instead of Friedman test?

Best regards,

20 REPLIES 20

Re: Friedman test on JMP?

Yes, a limitation of the Friedman test and ANY test with blocking is that the blocking variable does not interact with the factor.

 

To expand on this, suppose you have 10 blocks and 3 treatments. With the Friedman approach you are calculating ranks within each block. The ranks within each block will always add to 6. Therefore, when you conduct the testing there will not be any difference between the blocks (sums of squares will be 0 for the block effect).

If you DID put in an interaction (which you could try within JMP, you just need to use Fit Model instead of Fit Y by X), you would have 9 DF for the blocks, 2 DF for the treatment, and 18 DF for the interaction. You have 0 DF left for error. You have a saturated model and no testing would be available.

 

 

Dan Obermiller

Recommended Articles