cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
mvanderaa1
Level IV

DoE disallowed combination script/filter not working as expected

Hi, I keep getting runs in my design that should be restricted by my disallowed combination script. Or perhaps I'm not understanding the syntax. I have tried it both using the filter and as a script.

 

An example where the combination of S2S==5.8 & L2L>4 is not allowed, yet I get multiple runs that do not conform to that restriction (run 4, 5, 10). I attached the script for the design as well.

run 4_5_10 not allowed.png

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: DoE disallowed combination script/filter not working as expected

It happens sometimes with the numeric representation that 5.8 isn't "exactly" 5.8 when being checked by the designer. 

 

If you replace S2S == 5.8 in the disallowed combination with a "fuzzy equals", like Abs( S2S - 5.8 ) < 0.001, it should work as expected.

 

We eventually hope to add checks internally to watch out for cases like this.

 

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3

Re: DoE disallowed combination script/filter not working as expected

I was able to reproduce the problem, even after I removed the unnecessary L2L <= 5.5 comparison. I suggest contacting JMP Technical Support ([email protected]) about this problem. Please reply here with their answer.

Re: DoE disallowed combination script/filter not working as expected

It happens sometimes with the numeric representation that 5.8 isn't "exactly" 5.8 when being checked by the designer. 

 

If you replace S2S == 5.8 in the disallowed combination with a "fuzzy equals", like Abs( S2S - 5.8 ) < 0.001, it should work as expected.

 

We eventually hope to add checks internally to watch out for cases like this.

 

mvanderaa1
Level IV

Re: DoE disallowed combination script/filter not working as expected

This seems to do the trick, thanks

Recommended Articles