cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
YanivD
Level III

DOE approach

Hi,
Recently i have been asked if there is a reference for the following statement :
DOE approach is the optimal (best/only effective?) way to conduct experiments that will lead to data that can be analyzed and to a model or correlation and introductions.

Would appreciate it if someone can share an academic reference for thia kind of statement.

Thanks
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Victor_G
Super User

Re: DOE approach

Hi @YanivD,

No doubt about this statement !
DoE is the best (and most efficient) method to get informations with a minimum number of experiments, and in some cases the only way to get specific informations like interactions between factors. It's a methodology that can also support sequential experimentation (through Design augmentation), so it's highly adaptable depending on your initial findings/results.
You can find different publications aiming to demonstrate the use and effectiveness of DoE. Among (many !) others, here are some publications or links I found:
- An example with a comparison between OFAT and DoE approach : https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/topic/35533-one-factor-at-a-time-ofat-experimentation/
- "A Design of Experiments (DoE) Approach Accelerates the Optimization of Copper-Mediated 18F-Fluorination Reactions of Arylstannanes" (take a look at Figure 2) : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47846-6
- "Improvement of OFAT through DoE" 10e.xps (psu.edu)
- OFAT Vs DoE : D:DVICZITROM.DVI (psu.edu)

There are a lot of publications demonstrating the relevance and effectiveness of DoE, you can try searching for these papers on Google (or other search engines) by searching "comparison OFAT vs. DoE" or similar searches. There are also a lot of examples in the Community about successful DoEs, so take a look at JMP Discovery papers and presentations.

Hope this first answer will help you,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
Victor_G
Super User

Re: DOE approach

Hi @YanivD,

No doubt about this statement !
DoE is the best (and most efficient) method to get informations with a minimum number of experiments, and in some cases the only way to get specific informations like interactions between factors. It's a methodology that can also support sequential experimentation (through Design augmentation), so it's highly adaptable depending on your initial findings/results.
You can find different publications aiming to demonstrate the use and effectiveness of DoE. Among (many !) others, here are some publications or links I found:
- An example with a comparison between OFAT and DoE approach : https://www.benchmarksixsigma.com/forum/topic/35533-one-factor-at-a-time-ofat-experimentation/
- "A Design of Experiments (DoE) Approach Accelerates the Optimization of Copper-Mediated 18F-Fluorination Reactions of Arylstannanes" (take a look at Figure 2) : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47846-6
- "Improvement of OFAT through DoE" 10e.xps (psu.edu)
- OFAT Vs DoE : D:DVICZITROM.DVI (psu.edu)

There are a lot of publications demonstrating the relevance and effectiveness of DoE, you can try searching for these papers on Google (or other search engines) by searching "comparison OFAT vs. DoE" or similar searches. There are also a lot of examples in the Community about successful DoEs, so take a look at JMP Discovery papers and presentations.

Hope this first answer will help you,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)
YanivD
Level III

Re: DOE approach

Thanks a lot! Great

Re: DOE approach

I also recommend the book, "Optimal Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach," by Peter Goos and Bradley Jones, if you are going to use JMP to design and analyze your experiments.

statman
Super User

Re: DOE approach

More papers for folks new to DOE approach:

https://williamghunter.net/george-box-articles/statistics-for-discovery

https://williamghunter.net/george-box-articles/statistics_as_a_catalyst_to_learning

https://williamghunter.net/george-box-articles/the-scientific-context-of-quality-improvement

I'm obviously a fan of G.E.P. Box...

 

I will add, there are other ways to get data to provide insight to causal relationships.  When you have a lot of factors to consider, directed sampling (component of variation) studies are quite useful.

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box
Byron_JMP
Staff

Re: DOE approach

Use Google Scholar and Google DOE, or more specfically JMP, DOE. Its getting diffcult to keep up with the number of papers that use DOE in my field. In general the use of DOE in academic publications has grown alot.

 

Byron_JMP_0-1665669581529.png

About 4,660 results in 2022

 

JMP Systems Engineer, Health and Life Sciences (Pharma)