Is there a way to build a formula equivalent to «ColumnRank by…» (group). I normally use the distribution platform (with «by group» option) and save ranks for that purpose in a static column. But this time, I need a dynamic column (calculated).
The Col Rank(column, ) function does what you’re looking for. The default for breaking ties is row order, but there’s an optional third argument that allows for some other choices. Hope this helps.
Can you explain more please. The manual is very minimalist about this third argument.
Ranks each row’s value, from 1 for the lowest value to the number of non‐missing columns for the highest value. Ties are broken arbitrarily.
I don’t understand what it might mean and how to use it.
Thank you for your help!
I'm afraid the optional arguments for Col Rank() is not supported by the current JMP version.
I do not have a good workaround that would work truly dynamically. The column formula in the example below should work but only if the variable is sorted within groups.
dt = Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/Big Class.jmp");
dt << sort(by(:age, weight), Replace table(1));
F = Expr(
Eval(Eval Expr(Col Number(:weight, Row() <= Expr(Row()),:age)))
dt << New Column("Rank of weight by age", numeric, formula(Name Expr(F)));
Well, this is a very interesting workaround. It’s open to me a completely new area (Eval, Formula, etc.).
I'm crossing my fingers for a future JMP version with this new function "ColRank by…".
Thanks a lot for taking time to answer my question.
Sorry for the confusion, I apparently wasn’t paying attention to which version was active on my system when I was looking at this. So, as a result, you’ve gotten an “unauthorized” preview of functionality planned for a “future” JMP version.
No problem. I'm happy to see that one day my wishes will come true!
Thanks a lot again.
I am also dissatisfied with the idea of "Ties are broken arbitrarily". there should at least be an option to change that to ties get same rank like would happen in a regular ordinal variable.
I have another way to "rank by" without sorting the table - in my case sorting is a nuisance. it gives equal values to the ties.
Names Default To Here( 1 );
// define the data source
dt = Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/Big Class.jmp" );
// add a column for the rank
dt << New Column( "Rank" , numeric, ordinal);
//// option 1: Rank by Column
// extract the list of the by variable levels
byvarlist = associative array (dt:age) << get keys;
// create seperate rank lists of height for each age group
for (ib = 1, ib<= nitems(byvarlist), ib++,
eval (parse( "heightlist"||char(byvarlist[ib])||" = Associative Array( "|| char( dt:height[dt << get rows where (:age == byvarlist[ib])])||" ) << get keys"));
for (ic = 1, ic<=nrows(dt), ic++,
:Rank [ic] = eval( parse ( "loc( heightlist "||char(dt:age[ic] )||" ,"||char( dt:height[ic])||" ) " ));
//see if it worked
By( :age, :height ),
Order( Ascending, Ascending )
//// Option 2: Rank (without a by column)
// get the unique values for height as a list
heightlist = Associative Array( dt:height ) << get keys;
For( i = 1, i <= N Rows( dt ), i++,
dt:Rank[i] = Loc( heightlist, :height[i] );
//see if it worked
By( :height ),
Order( Ascending )
Thanks a lot Ron. It is an ingenious way to solve the problem.
if there is an issue with an update, all you need to do is delete the hard coded columns just before the update and re-introduce them immediately after.
delete hard coded columns;
re-calculate the hard coded columns;