cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Instantly extract effect sizes, F-ratios, and FDR-adjusted p-values from your models with the Calculate Effects Sizes extension, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
slemoult1
Level II

Best design for a DOE with 3 variables and one 4 level categorical

dear all

I am looking to find the best design with the following: 3 variables and 4 level categoricals. I have for now a custom design RSM with 28 sets. is there anything better?

Ideally I would like to reduce it to 15 sets.

Many Thanks in advance

Kind regards

Stephanie

 

10 REPLIES 10
statman
Super User

Re: Best design for a DOE with 3 variables and one 4 level categorical

Perhaps beyond the scope of your question, but the factors that affect design selection are:

  • Constraints: Time, money, measurement capability, etc. How many treatments can be made?
  • How many factors are to be manipulated (the number of hypotheses to be compared)?
  • How will noise be managed or partitioned?
  • Are some factors harder to change than others?  Are there other restrictions on randomization?
  • Are interactions (or other higher order effects) suspected/predicted?
    • What is the desired resolution? (What effects do you want to estimate/separate?)
"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box

Recommended Articles