User Community

Latest Discussions

How can I recreate a lost screening DOE design

I created a classical screening DOE with 6 factors. Using the default number of runs of 20 the jmp software made a design table. I didn't save the design table. I ran the DOE and collected the responses. To analyze the DOE and create prediction formulas I need the original design table. Each time I set up a screening DOE with the same factors and responses I get different design tables. Is there a...
drmouse

Discussions |
May 20, 2026 8:00 AM

1128 views | 4 replies
Mixture DoE with 6 ingredients, use maximum 3.

Dear Community, I'd like to set up a mixture DoE comprised of: Polymer: 80%Water: 18,4% - 20%Additive1: 0-0,8%Additive2: 0-0,8%Additive3: 0-0,8%Additive4: 0-0,8%Additive5: 0-0,2% Since Polymer ist constant, I removed it. Hence I get: Water: 92% - 100%Additive1: 0-4%Additive2: 0-4%Additive3: 0-4%Additive4: 0-4%Additive5: 0-1% Now I want to screen Additive performance, but have only 1 or 2 Additive...
DocBo

Discussions |
May 20, 2026 1:19 AM

2415 views | 5 replies
JMP file question

Hi, Is there a way for me and a collegue to work on the same JMP file in real time? We have JMP 17. Thanks!
Furbelows

Discussions |
May 18, 2026 8:05 PM

1209 views | 4 replies
GraphBuilder and Passing Bablok fit?

I have created a representation of my data using graph builder that I am happy with. I would like to include Passing Bablok fits, as this is the most appropriate method in this case. I know I can do this via bivariate fitting separately (and I have done so), but the graphical representation as well as the advanced fitting together is what I am after. How can I achieve this?
PurpleBat

Discussions |
May 18, 2026 8:02 PM

675 views | 2 replies
Probleme de connection

Bonjour, je n'arrive pas à me connecter sur mon compte, j'ai reçu un code de sécurité, et un autre lien "JMP-Windows-1668FDB2-...-1820-ZXJm-1.1" mais la connexion n'aboutit pas! merci pour votre retour
eric2

Discussions |
May 18, 2026 8:12 AM

533 views | 1 replies

Previous
Next

Latest Discussions

How can I recreate a lost screening DOE design

I created a classical screening DOE with 6 factors. Using the default number of runs of 20 the jmp software made a design table. I didn't save the design table. I ran the DOE and collected the responses. To analyze the DOE and create prediction formulas I need the original design table. Each time I set up a screening DOE with the same factors and responses I get different design tables. Is there a...
drmouse

Discussions |
May 20, 2026 8:00 AM

1128 views | 4 replies
Mixture DoE with 6 ingredients, use maximum 3.

Dear Community, I'd like to set up a mixture DoE comprised of: Polymer: 80%Water: 18,4% - 20%Additive1: 0-0,8%Additive2: 0-0,8%Additive3: 0-0,8%Additive4: 0-0,8%Additive5: 0-0,2% Since Polymer ist constant, I removed it. Hence I get: Water: 92% - 100%Additive1: 0-4%Additive2: 0-4%Additive3: 0-4%Additive4: 0-4%Additive5: 0-1% Now I want to screen Additive performance, but have only 1 or 2 Additive...
DocBo

Discussions |
May 20, 2026 1:19 AM

2415 views | 5 replies
JMP file question

Hi, Is there a way for me and a collegue to work on the same JMP file in real time? We have JMP 17. Thanks!
Furbelows

Discussions |
May 18, 2026 8:05 PM

1209 views | 4 replies
GraphBuilder and Passing Bablok fit?

I have created a representation of my data using graph builder that I am happy with. I would like to include Passing Bablok fits, as this is the most appropriate method in this case. I know I can do this via bivariate fitting separately (and I have done so), but the graphical representation as well as the advanced fitting together is what I am after. How can I achieve this?
PurpleBat

Discussions |
May 18, 2026 8:02 PM

675 views | 2 replies
Probleme de connection

Bonjour, je n'arrive pas à me connecter sur mon compte, j'ai reçu un code de sécurité, et un autre lien "JMP-Windows-1668FDB2-...-1820-ZXJm-1.1" mais la connexion n'aboutit pas! merci pour votre retour
eric2

Discussions |
May 18, 2026 8:12 AM

533 views | 1 replies

Previous
Next

Latest Discussions

"Replace missing with previous value" for multiple column selection on JMP19

Previous versions of JMP would let users select multiple columns and use the "Replace missing with previous value" option from the right-click drop-down menu, applying the function to all columns selected. With JMP19, I can only do it if I select one column at a time. Is there a way to keep doing with with multiple columns selected?
AcceptanceOwl96

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 9:59 AM

467 views | 0 replies
How to Look at Range Data High Medium Low

Looking for the Best way to analysis Data when I have Ranges Upper, Mid and Lower for both Voltage and Freq. data. See RED Columns. Guess I could perform a Control Chart or Dist. but like to to see if their is a shift of this many Electrical Devices. Any Suggestions?
CREV

Discussions |
May 8, 2026 2:34 PM

530 views | 0 replies
Inquiry regarding the procedure for PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)

[Environment] Version: JMP(r) Student Edition 19.1.0 (914688) License: For Academic Use Only (Expires: 2027/04/13) OS: Microsoft Windows 11 Home (10.0.26200.0)
[Inquiry] Regarding the procedure for performing PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)
I am attempting to perform a PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) using JMP Student Edition, as I understand this feature is supported in this edition. I ...
SignBurro204

Discussions |
Apr 24, 2026 3:30 AM

864 views | 0 replies
defining function scope changes how result is returned

Why don't all three of these return their unevaluated argument like the first one does? Is there a way to make the last two work like the first? Inside the function, e is still unevaluated, this seems to happen when the result is returned. names default to here(1); ns = New Namespace("n"); foo = function({e}, Name Expr(e) ); ns:bar = function({e}, Name Expr(e) ); show( foo( expr( notavar...
ih

Discussions |
Apr 20, 2026 1:45 PM

522 views | 0 replies
How does JMP bias the rate of count when calculating the probability of Partition platform with categorical responses?

For categorical responses Partition has the response rates that are slightly biased away from zero to avoid having attributed probabilities of zero. I would like to know how to calcurate the biased probabilities.
Takashi

Discussions |
Apr 16, 2026 8:41 PM

534 views | 0 replies