cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Practice JMP using these webinar videos and resources. We hold live Mastering JMP Zoom webinars with Q&A most Fridays at 2 pm US Eastern Time. See the list and register. Local-language live Zoom webinars occur in the UK, Western Europe and Asia. See your country jmp.com/mastering site.

Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Developer Tutorial: Designing and Evaluating Measurement Systems Studies Prior to Implementation

 

Note: All the capabilities shown are in JMP 17, althogh JMP Pro 17 is used for the demo.  The video includes Q&A and comments from the presenter Caleb King @calking about how MSA works plus plans for possible enhacements. 

 

See how to:

  • Understand basics of MSA Design
    • MSA primary focus is on decomposing variation in product measurements into distinct sources, with the goal to reduce or elimnate one or more sources

    • The metric of interest is not an effect size (i.e. difference in mean behavior), but rather the variance contribution from a particular source

    • Underlying models are primarily random effects models or even mixed effects models if biasing terms are included

    • Nested factors are also common in MSA, but not exclusively 

  • See improvements made in JMP 17

    • Better diagnostics that more closely align with MSA analytics platforms

    • Greater user interaction that allows exploration of what-if scenarios

    • Fexible Design structure interface so  users can specify nesting/crossing relationships in the design

  • Understand that diagnostics are based on simulation of variance estimates, based on the standard ANOVA approach
    • Example is a 3- factor fully crossed MSA where mean squares have known Chi-square distributions that are easily be simulated and then used to compute confidence intervals, variance proportions, etc.

  • Include nested and crossed structures
  • Make design and evaluate diagnostics for two examples

MSA Design Factor ScreenMSA Design Factor Screen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The video includes Questions ansered at the webinar by Caleb @calking, Don McCormack @DonMcCormack and Jerry Fish @JerryFish.

 

One person asked online if nesting would occur when testing same methods on different equipment.  They responded: Probably not, but it would ultimately depend on how the experiment was run what assumptions were made about the methods and equipment.  If you considered the equipment/method to be a random observation from a much larger population, then they may be considered nested (in some way). If you considered them from a fixed set of values (e.g., types of equipment), then they would more likely be treated as crossed.

 

 

Resources

Recommended Articles