cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Simultaneous Prediction Intervals

Please implement simultaneous prediction intervals in the distribution platform. This type of interval sits in between a prediction interval that predicts where a single future value will fall and a tolerance interval that predicts where all future values will fall. The simultaneous prediction interval allows to set the interval for a certain number of future values.

See a description here: https://search.r-project.org/CRAN/refmans/EnvStats/html/predIntNormSimultaneous.html

 

What inspired this wish list request? Acceptance criteria for pharmaceutical comparability studies must be set. For certain quality attributes, it is appropriate to define a range based on a number of pre-change manufactures batches, e.g., six. Post-change, you will usually just have three batches. Currently, the best way is to calculate a tolerance interval based on the pre-change batches, and then check if the 3 post-change batches fall within in. With the simultaneous prediction interval it would be possible to set a range that is precisely expected for a given number of post-change batches.

 

 

What is the improvement you would like to see? The Distribution platform could have this option next to confidence and tolerance intervals.

 

 

Why is this idea important? Enable appropriate setting of acceptance criteria for pharmaceutical comparability studies.

 

 

1 Comment
Status changed to: Acknowledged

Thanks @Bashburz1 for submitting your request. We will discuss your request this internally and will you know.