cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Check out the JMP® Marketplace featured Capability Explorer add-in
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
TCM
TCM
Level IV

What is Quality as a measure in Multiple Correspondence Analysis?

This is a continuation of a project the result of which has been met with approval.

 

Context: Multiple Correspondence Analysis was done on questions from a survey in 7 countries.  We were able to extract insights on by-country responses to the grouped questions (the responses are supercategories T2B, Neutral, B2B).  There are a few questions posed:

 

Questions: 1) Is the Quality statistic a measure of response homogeneity, i.e., how consistent the consumers in the country responded to the question?  If so, it would lead us to make some assumptions about the country.  The JMP library does state quality is an indication of how well the point (the country in this case) is represented in the dimensions. [I am having a hard time understanding what this means in the real world].  Appreciate further explanation.

                  2) How is Quality calculated?  (I can't get to the Quality values in the table with the other givens below).

 

Table 1: Singular Values   
Singular ValueInertiaChiSquarePercentCumulative Percent
0.183060.033511717959.6159.61
0.108710.01182605821.0280.63
0.066330.004422557.8388.45
0.047530.0022611584.0292.47
0.041380.001718783.0595.52
0.037760.001437312.5498.05
0.033090.001095611.95100
     
Table2: Summary Statistics  
COUNTRYQuality(dim=2)MassInertia 
C0.989510.124970.44327 
F0.720690.125090.07058 
G0.556720.124970.1194 
I0.549830.125090.06586 
R0.951290.124780.15764 
S0.313920.124970.03898 
U0.415430.125030.04796 
A0.567780.125090.05631 
     
Table3: Partial Contributions to Inertia for Row Points
CategoryDim 1Dim 2Dim 3 
C0.728430.02110.01593 
F0.069950.043620.03728 
G0.102990.024190.61815 
I0.013180.134870.20306 
R0.007720.691530.03045 
S0.006390.040080.07791 
U0.03290.001490.00725 
A0.038430.043110.00998 

 

Thank you in advance for any help!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: What is Quality as a measure in Multiple Correspondence Analysis?

Hi TCM,

From towards the end of the JMP help section for MCA, there's a section that (potentially) answers your questions: 

Quality is the ratio of the squared distance of a point from the origin in the space defined by the specified number of dimensions to the distance from the origin in the space with the maximum number of dimensions. For the Chi-Square metric, a point’s quality in a given dimension can be obtained from the cosine that its vector makes with the vector that defines the dimension. Quality is also equal to the ratio of the sum of inertias in the specified dimensions to the sum of the inertias in all dimensions. Quality indicates how well the point is represented in the lower-dimensional space.

There are also similar explanations of mass, inertia, and relative inertia. Hope this helps.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2

Re: What is Quality as a measure in Multiple Correspondence Analysis?

Hi TCM,

From towards the end of the JMP help section for MCA, there's a section that (potentially) answers your questions: 

Quality is the ratio of the squared distance of a point from the origin in the space defined by the specified number of dimensions to the distance from the origin in the space with the maximum number of dimensions. For the Chi-Square metric, a point’s quality in a given dimension can be obtained from the cosine that its vector makes with the vector that defines the dimension. Quality is also equal to the ratio of the sum of inertias in the specified dimensions to the sum of the inertias in all dimensions. Quality indicates how well the point is represented in the lower-dimensional space.

There are also similar explanations of mass, inertia, and relative inertia. Hope this helps.

TCM
TCM
Level IV

Re: What is Quality as a measure in Multiple Correspondence Analysis?

Apologies for the late response:  I was out... 

 

Yes, I did see that paragraph.  I tried to follow it in my attempts to calculate for myself where the quality values came from.  Still didn't get to the reported values :(.  Surprisingly, I didn't see a lot of info out there in the www.

 

Appreciate your help.--tm