cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • See how to design an experiment, explore factor-response relationships, assess tradeoffs, and ID best settings. Register for Sep. 11 Mastering JMP.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
senatorx
Level III

Validate column name exists before graphing

Hi,  I am trying to validate that a data table contains a certain column name prior to creating graphs:

hasname1 = 0;
     for (colval == 1, colval <= Ncols(dt), colval++,
           colName = Column Name(colval);
           if ( colName == "name1",
                 hasname1 = 1;

           );
if (hasname1 == 1,
      //create graph
);

However, the comparison never returns true because "name1" is a string data type, and the column name returned from Column Name(colval) is some other data type.

How can I get a string value from a Column Name to make a valid string comparison?

Thanks!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
ms
Super User (Alumni) ms
Super User (Alumni)

Re: Validate column name exists before graphing

You can use dt << get column names(string); to get column names as a string instead of a column object.

Try this single line of code. Should assign 1 or 0 to hasname1.

hasname1 = Contains( dt << get column names( string ), "name1" );



View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
ms
Super User (Alumni) ms
Super User (Alumni)

Re: Validate column name exists before graphing

You can use dt << get column names(string); to get column names as a string instead of a column object.

Try this single line of code. Should assign 1 or 0 to hasname1.

hasname1 = Contains( dt << get column names( string ), "name1" );



senatorx
Level III

Re: Validate column name exists before graphing

Works, great, and much shorter than what I was doing.  Thank you.

Recommended Articles