turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Three-way ANOVA lost DFs

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 1:16 AM
(3226 views)

Hello,

I learned JMP in class using "perfect" dataset but now I am trying to use it for my research work by running a three way ANOVA using the attached data. Generally, there are three different factors (Current, HRT and Temp) and I would like to see to sig. effect and interaction of each factor on the result (Inf pH). However, the "Effect Test" from the analysis showed "Lost DFs" instead of p-values. I have a pretty small dataset (33 points) so could this be the problem?

Here is what I've done:

1) Analyze -> Fit Model

2) Insert "Inf pH" as Y variable

3) Insert Current, HRT and Temp as Model Effects with * interaction (I also tried doing 2-way ANOVA using only two factors)

4) Run using "Std Least Squares" as Personality (I tried other personalities as well but did not work)

I would really appreciate any inputs on how to work around this dataset, in order to get the "Effect Test" p-value result! Thank you very much!

Ji Yeow

Solved! Go to Solution.

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 2:12 AM
(6171 views)

Ji Yeow,

The issue you have is that your effects are confounded with each other. You really only have 2 groups. One group has a Current=100, HRT=8 and Temp=10. The second group has Current=300, HRT=12 and Temp=22.5. Without having measurements made for the different combinations of Current, HRT and Temp, the analysis can not be performed. That is, you need to have measurements where Current=100, HRT=8 and Temp=22.5, measurements where Current=100, HRT= 12 and Temp=10, and the other combinations of the 3 factors. For a "Full Factorial" analysis, you need to have measurements made for each of the possible combinations of the 3 factors. A "Partial Factorial" analysis could also be run, however, for it to be a valid analysis, the design needs to be be developed using DOE(Desing of Experiments), to make sure the final analysis will be valid.

The only analysis that you could do with your current data is a Oneway analysis. If you chose to use Fit Model, just specify one of the factors.

Jim

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 7:06 AM
(6158 views)

Just adding a bit to Jim's insightful reply:

The confounding is not perfect between Current and HRT, but it is likely that the correlation of the estimates is strong enough to preclude enough power to determine their significance, especially if you include the interaction effect in the model.

Going back to Jim's reply and assuming for the moment that the three factors are perfectly confounded, you can estimate the one-way ANOVA model with this data but **the choice of which factor is subjective and arbitrary**. The data **cannot** be used to determine which one is, in fact, attributable to any effect on the response.

Learn it once, use it forever!

5 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 2:12 AM
(6172 views)

Ji Yeow,

The issue you have is that your effects are confounded with each other. You really only have 2 groups. One group has a Current=100, HRT=8 and Temp=10. The second group has Current=300, HRT=12 and Temp=22.5. Without having measurements made for the different combinations of Current, HRT and Temp, the analysis can not be performed. That is, you need to have measurements where Current=100, HRT=8 and Temp=22.5, measurements where Current=100, HRT= 12 and Temp=10, and the other combinations of the 3 factors. For a "Full Factorial" analysis, you need to have measurements made for each of the possible combinations of the 3 factors. A "Partial Factorial" analysis could also be run, however, for it to be a valid analysis, the design needs to be be developed using DOE(Desing of Experiments), to make sure the final analysis will be valid.

The only analysis that you could do with your current data is a Oneway analysis. If you chose to use Fit Model, just specify one of the factors.

Jim

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 7:06 AM
(6159 views)

Just adding a bit to Jim's insightful reply:

The confounding is not perfect between Current and HRT, but it is likely that the correlation of the estimates is strong enough to preclude enough power to determine their significance, especially if you include the interaction effect in the model.

Going back to Jim's reply and assuming for the moment that the three factors are perfectly confounded, you can estimate the one-way ANOVA model with this data but **the choice of which factor is subjective and arbitrary**. The data **cannot** be used to determine which one is, in fact, attributable to any effect on the response.

Learn it once, use it forever!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 7:48 AM
(3205 views)

Mark is correct......I missed the few rows at the bottom where current is 100.

Jim

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 11:21 AM
(3196 views)

Yes, Jim, but your point essentially stands.

A designed experiment, possibly smaller than this data set, could have provide much more information. Live and learn!

Learn it once, use it forever!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Dec 30, 2016 9:36 PM
(3173 views)

Thanks a lot Jim and Mark! This is a great explanation and is definitely helpful with my analysis!