cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
The Discovery Summit 2025 Call for Content is open! Submit an abstract today to present at our premier analytics conference.
Get the free JMP Student Edition for qualified students and instructors at degree granting institutions.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
View Original Published Thread

Restrict combinations in DOE

MickE94
Level I

Hello all,

 

I'm sorry if the answer is completely obvious, I just started using JMP. I'm trying to design a DOE containing 1 response and 10 factors, let's call them A-J for now. The factors are either excluded from the run, or present at a certain concentration. In the eventual design certain combinations are restricted, namely A-B, C-D, E-F, G-H and I-J. I tried playing around with the factor constraint option, but I can't figure it out. Can anyone clarify what to do? Thanks in advance!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I am sorry but I do not understand your confusion. Please explain it so I can clarify my answer for you.

 

Here is a design based on my approach, so we have something tangible to discuss.

design.PNG

View solution in original post

7 REPLIES 7


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

Are you saying that either A or B is present at some concentration, but not simultaneously? Then you might have one two-level categorical factor to identify the ingredient (e.g., levels A and B) and another factor for the non-zero concentration range.

MickE94
Level I


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

Indeed, A and B can not be present simultaneous.

 

Ah yes that makes sense! But how does the factor for both ingredients being excluded look like? Or can I also make it 3-level categorical?


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I generally recommend against using 0 as a level for a continuous factor. Using 0 turns it into a categorical factor (absent, present). It is better to use two non-zero levels so that you can see the effect of changing the level.

Do you still need to cover the case where both A and B are 0 (absent)?

MickE94
Level I


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I understand the case of making a categorical factor for A or B present, and why it is recommended. But I'm confused on what to do with the "A and B absent" factor.


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I am sorry but I do not understand your confusion. Please explain it so I can clarify my answer for you.

 

Here is a design based on my approach, so we have something tangible to discuss.

design.PNG

MickE94
Level I


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

Ah yes now I understand your approach!

Would it also work to make each ingredient 3-level categorical, including A, B or 0? Or do you foresee problems with such an approach?


Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I think your scheme works if you have several pairs of ingredients and some formulations should not include either of the two options for a given pair.