cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
MickE94
Level I

Restrict combinations in DOE

Hello all,

 

I'm sorry if the answer is completely obvious, I just started using JMP. I'm trying to design a DOE containing 1 response and 10 factors, let's call them A-J for now. The factors are either excluded from the run, or present at a certain concentration. In the eventual design certain combinations are restricted, namely A-B, C-D, E-F, G-H and I-J. I tried playing around with the factor constraint option, but I can't figure it out. Can anyone clarify what to do? Thanks in advance!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I am sorry but I do not understand your confusion. Please explain it so I can clarify my answer for you.

 

Here is a design based on my approach, so we have something tangible to discuss.

design.PNG

View solution in original post

7 REPLIES 7

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

Are you saying that either A or B is present at some concentration, but not simultaneously? Then you might have one two-level categorical factor to identify the ingredient (e.g., levels A and B) and another factor for the non-zero concentration range.

MickE94
Level I

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

Indeed, A and B can not be present simultaneous.

 

Ah yes that makes sense! But how does the factor for both ingredients being excluded look like? Or can I also make it 3-level categorical?

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I generally recommend against using 0 as a level for a continuous factor. Using 0 turns it into a categorical factor (absent, present). It is better to use two non-zero levels so that you can see the effect of changing the level.

Do you still need to cover the case where both A and B are 0 (absent)?

MickE94
Level I

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I understand the case of making a categorical factor for A or B present, and why it is recommended. But I'm confused on what to do with the "A and B absent" factor.

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I am sorry but I do not understand your confusion. Please explain it so I can clarify my answer for you.

 

Here is a design based on my approach, so we have something tangible to discuss.

design.PNG

MickE94
Level I

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

Ah yes now I understand your approach!

Would it also work to make each ingredient 3-level categorical, including A, B or 0? Or do you foresee problems with such an approach?

Re: Restrict combinations in DOE

I think your scheme works if you have several pairs of ingredients and some formulations should not include either of the two options for a given pair.