cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
gugiyu
Level I

Mean Diamond Confidence Intervals

I'm doing a simple Oneway Analysis, ~10 groups each with # of data points ranging up to 20.

I noticed that there are 2 95% CIs that are calculated:

1.  One set for each group in the Means and Std Dev report below the chart, where CIs are calculated off of the Std Dev of each individual group

2.  One set for the Anova, where the Std Dev of all groups are assumed to be the same (calculated off of the Std Dev of the entire population).

The chart shows the mean diamonds, which shows #2 option above.

However, 2 of my groups have significantly higher std dev, and I'd like that to be reflected in my chart and CIs.

My questions are:

1.  Is there a way to get the Upper/Lower CIs from the "Mean & Std Dev" report to show up on the graph?

2.  Is there a reason not to do this?

Thanks in advance.

0 REPLIES 0

Recommended Articles