cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5552%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ESo%20che%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20c'%C3%A8%20comunque%20la%20possibilit%C3%A0%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5552%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%26lt%3Bmeta%20http-equiv%3D%22Content-Type%22%20content%3D%22text%2Fhtml%3B%20charset%3DUTF-8%22%20%2F%26gt%3B%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FExponential_integral%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%20La%20funzione%20Ei%20(X)%20%C3%A8%20(credo)%20una%20funzione%20abbastanza%20rara.%20%3C%2FA%3EAlmeno%20non%20ho%20mai%20dovuto%20occuparmene%20prima.%20Ma%20%C3%A8%20saltato%20fuori%20in%20un'analisi%20che%20sto%20facendo%2C%20mi%20chiedo%20se%20ci%20sia%20comunque%20da%20codificare%20in%20una%20formula%20in%20JMP.%20Chiaramente%2C%20non%20%C3%A8%20l%C3%AC%20per%20impostazione%20predefinita%2C%20ma%20esiste%20un%20modo%20per%20inserire%20manualmente%20questo%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CDL%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%20%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3CIMG%20alt%3D%22%5C%20Mbox%20%7B%7D%20Ei%20(x)%20%3D%20%5C%20int%20_%20%7B-%20%5C%20infty%7D%20%5E%20x%20%5C%20frac%20%7Be%20%5E%20t%7D%20t%20%5C%2C%20dt%20%5C%2C.%22%20class%3D%22tex%20jiveImage%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fmath%2Fa%2F1%2Fa%2Fa1a914cbf27ea5da234936f5e85f07ef.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3EIn%20una%20colonna%20formula%3F%20Grazie%20in%20anticipo.%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E--SurfaceThought%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3CDD%3E%3C%2FDD%3E%3C%2FDL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5565%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5565%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EPMroz%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EQuesto%20%C3%A8%20incredibile!%20Funziona%20perfettamente!%20Questo%20%C3%A8%20sicuramente%20un%20lavoro%20meritevole%20di%20birra%2C%20se%20pensi%20a%20un%20modo%20in%20cui%20posso%20comprarlo%2C%20fammelo%20sapere%20%3CSPAN%20__jive_emoticon_name%3D%22wink%22%20__jive_macro_name%3D%22emoticon%22%20class%3D%22jive_macro%20jive_macro_emoticon%20jive_emote%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2F5.0.2%2Fimages%2Femoticons%2Fwink.gif%22%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E--SurfaceThought%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5564%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5564%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EOK%20ecco%20l'implementazione%20JSL%20del%20codice%20Fortran.%26nbsp%3B%20Il%20codice%20viene%20eseguito%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20necessario%20testarlo%20per%20assicurarsi%20che%20i%20numeri%20siano%20buoni.%26nbsp%3B%20%C3%88%20praticamente%20una%20conversione%20dritta%20del%20programma%20Fortran.%26nbsp%3B%20Esercizio%20interessante!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5563%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5563%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EPenso%20che%20ci%20sia%20un%20pacchetto%20R%20che%20far%C3%A0%20l'integrazione.%26nbsp%3B%20Sarebbe%20pi%C3%B9%20facile%20da%20implementare%20che%20ricodificare%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5562%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5562%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESono%20praticamente%20lingue%20completamente%20diverse.%26nbsp%3B%20Se%20ho%20un%20po%20'di%20tempo%20libero%20(hah)%20prendo%20una%20coltellata%20per%20convertirlo.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5561%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5561%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ES%C3%AC%2C%20pi%C3%B9%20l'ho%20guardato%20(la%20gamma%20incompleta)%2C%20meno%20ero%20felice%20e%20non%20riuscivo%20a%20trovare%20un%20modo%20semplice%20per%20attirare%20la%20simmetria%2C%20specialmente%20per%20queste%20funzioni.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOh%20e%20per%20quanto%20riguarda%20la%20traduzione%20di%20FORTRAN%20in%20JSL%2C%20la%20parola%20%22condannato%22%20%C3%A8%20abbastanza%20appropriata.%20Il%20codice%20MATLAB%20sarebbe%20pi%C3%B9%20facile%20da%20tradurre%2C%20penso.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5560%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5560%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EQuesto%20%C3%A8%20il%20posto%20in%20cui%20vado%20oltre%20la%20mia%20testa%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESono%20molto%20pi%C3%B9%20uno%20statistico%20che%20un%20programmatore%20(anche%20se%20non%20sono%20molto%20di%20nessuno%20dei%20due%20%3CSPAN%20__jive_emoticon_name%3D%22laugh%22%20__jive_macro_name%3D%22emoticon%22%20class%3D%22jive_macro%20jive_macro_emoticon%20jive_emote%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2F5.0.2%2Fimages%2Femoticons%2Flaugh.gif%22%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20).%20Quanto%20%C3%A8%20vicino%20FORTRAN%20a%20JSL%3F%20Non%20ne%20ho%20conoscenza.%20Se%20copio%20e%20incollassi%20l'intera%20cosa%20in%20una%20finestra%20di%20script%20JSL%20e%20continuassi%20a%20cercare%20di%20eseguirlo%20e%20correggere%20gli%20errori%20man%20mano%20che%20si%20presentavano%2C%20avrei%20avuto%20successo%20o%20sarei%20stato%20condannato%20senza%20alcuna%20conoscenza%20di%20FORTAN%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E--SurfaceThought%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5559%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5559%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EScusa%2C%20%C3%A8%20stato%20stupido%20da%20parte%20mia.%20Intendevo%20come%20una%20funzione%20di%20integrazione%2C%20non%20come%20una%20funzione%20round%20to%20integer.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20SurfaceThought%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5558%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5558%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESteve%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EUsare%20la%20funzione%20gamma%20per%20calcolare%20Ei%20(x)%20%C3%A8%20cos%C3%AC%20allettante%2C%20e%20cos%C3%AC%20vicino%20alla%20soluzione%2C%20ma%20dopo%20aver%20giocato%20con%20esso%2C%20purtroppo%20penso%20che%20non%20funzioner%C3%A0.%26nbsp%3B%20La%20funzione%20Gamma%20fornita%20in%20JMP%20consente%20di%20calcolare%20la%20funzione%20gamma%20completa%20o%20la%20funzione%20gamma%20incompleta%20inferiore.%20In%20altre%20parole%2C%20ti%20consente%20di%20integrare%20da%20zero%20a%20infinito%20o%20zero%20a%20qualche%20valore%20x%20positivo%2C%20ma%20non%20puoi%20passare%20al%20limite%20inferiore%20di%20integrazione%3A%20%C3%A8%20sempre%20zero.%20L'integrale%20esponenziale%20%C3%A8%20correlato%20al%20%3CEM%3E%20superiore%20%3C%2FEM%3E%20funzione%20gamma%20incompleta%2C%20in%20quanto%20per%20calcolarlo%20%C3%A8%20necessario%20avere%20un%20limite%20inferiore%20di%20integrazione%20variabile%20e%20integrare%20all'infinito.%20Poich%C3%A9%20la%20funzione%20gamma%20cos%C3%AC%20com'%C3%A8%20in%20JMP%20non%20consente%20un%20limite%20inferiore%20di%20integrazione%2C%20penso%20che%20questo%20approccio%20semplicemente%20non%20funzioner%C3%A0.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20ugualmente%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E--SurfaceThought%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5557%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5557%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EEcco%20un'implementazione%20Fortran%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.sc.fsu.edu%2F~jburkardt%2Ff77_src%2Ftoms385%2Ftoms385.html%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.sc.fsu.edu%2F~jburkardt%2Ff77_src%2Ftoms385%2Ftoms385.html%20%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ENon%20dovrebbe%20essere%20troppo%20difficile%20per%20convertire%20in%20JSL.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5556%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5556%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EIn%20JMP%20usa%20Floor%20(x)%20per%20ottenere%20ci%C3%B2%20che%20Int%20(x)%20in%20Excel.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5555%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5555%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ENon%20basta%20un%20utente%20JMP%20per%20sapere%20-%20molto%20pi%C3%B9%20di%20una%20persona%20SAS.%26nbsp%3B%20Ma%20l'integrazione%20non%20%C3%A8%20qualcosa%20su%20cui%20SAS%20%C3%A8%20molto%20forte%20a%20livello%20di%20funzione%2C%20sebbene%20ci%20siano%20alcuni%20approcci%20e%20macro%20PROC%20FCMP%20che%20io%20conosca.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EQuello%20che%20pensavo%20fosse%20una%20possibilit%C3%A0%20era%20usare%20alcune%20delle%20funzioni%20gamma%20associate%20a%20Ei%20(x)%2C%20come%20la%20funzione%20gamma%20incompleta%20e%20scalare%20opportunamente%20l'input%20e%20l'output.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5554%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5554%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESteve%3A%20Grazie%20per%20la%20rapida%20risposta%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHo%20osservato%20le%20approssimazioni%20e%20non%20sono%20sicuro%20che%20funzioneranno%20per%20i%20miei%20scopi.%20L'approssimazione%20della%20serie%20Taylor%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CIMG%20alt%3D%22%5C%20mathrm%20%7BEi%7D%20(x)%20%3D%20%5C%20gamma%20%2B%20%5C%20ln%20%7C%20x%20%7C%20%2B%20%5C%20sum_%20%7Bk%20%3D%201%7D%20%5E%20%7B%5C%20infty%7D%20%5C%20frac%20%7Bx%20%5E%20k%7D%20%7Bk%20%5C%3B%20k!%7D%20%5C%20qquad%20x%20%5C%20neq%200%22%20class%3D%22tex%20jiveImage%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fmath%2Fc%2Fc%2Fc%2Fccc772140a95ddca1e4f017fa4ac147f.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eapparentemente%20%C3%A8%20lento%20a%20convergere%2C%20e%20avrebbe%20bisogno%20di%20k%20%3D%2030%20per%20avere%20una%20precisione%20di%20tre%20decimali%20ai%20livelli%20di%20x%20che%20avrei%20a%20che%20fare%20con.%20Inoltre%2C%20la%20pagina%20wiki%20afferma%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EQuesta%20formula%20pu%C3%B2%20essere%20utilizzata%20per%20calcolare%20%3CIMG%20alt%3D%22%5C%20Mathrm%20%7B%7D%20E_1%20(x)%22%20class%3D%22tex%20jiveImage%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fmath%2Fc%2F8%2F1%2Fc81db16e4bfd87b2f187d6bd18c4466d.png%22%20%2F%3E%20con%20operazioni%20in%20virgola%20mobile%20per%20reali%20%3CIMG%20alt%3D%22X%22%20class%3D%22tex%20jiveImage%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fmath%2F9%2Fd%2Fd%2F9dd4e461268c8034f5c8564e155c67a6.png%22%20%2F%3E%20tra%200%20e%202%2C5.%20Per%20%3CIMG%20alt%3D%22x%26gt%3B%202.5%22%20class%3D%22tex%20jiveImage%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fmath%2F2%2F9%2F1%2F29111d391fbddd6380fda61bce0840df.png%22%20%2F%3E%20%2C%20il%20risultato%20%C3%A8%20inaccurato%20a%20causa%20di%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FLoss_of_significance%22%20title%3D%22Perdita%20di%20significato%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20cancellazione%20%3C%2FA%3E%20.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIl%20che%20%C3%A8%20piuttosto%20inquietante%2C%20visto%20che%20avr%C3%B2%20a%20che%20fare%20con%20valori%20x%20maggiori%20di%202%2C5.%20Capisco%20che%20le%20%22operazioni%20in%20virgola%20mobile%22%20significano%20semplicemente%20che%20il%20dispositivo%20di%20calcolo%20termina%20a%20un%20certo%20numero%20di%20punti%20decimali%20dopo%20ogni%20fase%20del%20calcolo.%20JMP%20utilizza%20operazioni%20in%20virgola%20mobile%3F%20C'%C3%A8%20anche%20un'alternativa%3F%20Suppongo%20che%20potrei%20trasformare%20x%20in%20qualche%20modo%20in%20modo%20che%20i%20valori%20si%20adattino%20tra%200%20e%202%2C5.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EC'%C3%A8%20un'altra%20approssimazione%20che%20%C3%A8%20divergente%2C%20che%20non%20%C3%A8%20grande%20perch%C3%A9%20%C3%A8%20divergente%2C%20ma%20anche%20perch%C3%A9%20l'errore%20sembra%20essere%20molto%20grande%20per%20i%20piccoli%20valori%20di%20x%20(meno%20di%20uno)%2C%20che%20%C3%A8%20anche%20nell'intervallo%20di%20valori%20x%20che%20posso%20uso.%20Se%20ho%20bisogno%20di%20usare%20questa%20approssimazione%2C%20dovr%C3%B2%20farlo%2C%20ma%20vorrei%20salvarlo%20per%20l'ultima%20opzione.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIl%20problema%20con%20il%20calcolo%20dell'Ei%20(X)%20e%20l'importazione%20in%20JMP%2C%20%C3%A8%20che%20l'argomento%20dell'integrale%20esponenziale%20include%20un%20parametro%20che%20voglio%20risolvere%20per%20l'utilizzo%20di%20minimi%20quadrati%20non%20lineari.%20Pertanto%2C%20deve%20essere%20effettivamente%20codificato%20in%20JMP%20in%20modo%20che%20JMP%20possa%20modificare%20il%20parametro%20per%20risolverlo%20iterativamente.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C3%88%20proprio%20vero%20che%20non%20c'%C3%A8%20una%20funzione%20INT%20()%20in%20JMP%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20per%20l'aiuto%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E--SurfaceThought%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-5553%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20So%20che%20questo%20%C3%A8%20un%20po%20'allungato%2C%20ma%20%C3%A8%20comunque%20in%20grado%20di%20codificare%20la%20funzione%20Ei%20(x)%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-5553%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ENon%20cos%C3%AC%20raro.%26nbsp%3B%20La%20pagina%20MATLAB%20fornisce%20molte%20approssimazioni%2C%20quindi%20potrebbe%20esserci%20qualcosa%20che%20pu%C3%B2%20essere%20sgranato%20dalle%20funzioni%20di%20JMP.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EVedere%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fmathworld.wolfram.com%2FExponentialIntegral.html%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Fmathworld.wolfram.com%2FExponentialIntegral.html%20%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGuarda%20anche%20la%20libreria%20GNU%20(%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnu.org%2Fsoftware%2Fgsl%2Fmanual%2Fhtml_node%2FExponential-Integral.html%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnu.org%2Fsoftware%2Fgsl%2Fmanual%2Fhtml_node%2FExponential-Integral.html%20%3C%2FA%3E%20).%26nbsp%3B%20Si%20pu%C3%B2%20usare%20questo%20per%20generare%20un%20oggetto%20R%2C%20e%20quindi%20estrarlo%20in%20JMP.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESteve%20Denham%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
surfacethought
Level III

I know this is a bit of a stretch, but is there anyway to encode the Ei(x) function in JMP.

     The Ei(X) function is (I guess) a fairly rare function. At least I've never had to deal with it before. But it has popped up in an analysis I am doing, I am wondering if there is anyway to encode it        into a formula in JMP. Clearly, it isn't in there by default, but is there a way to manually enter this:

 \mbox{Ei}(x)=\int_{-\infty}^x\frac{e^t}t\,dt.\,
Into a formula column? Thanks in advance.
--SurfaceThought
13 REPLIES 13
pmroz
Super User

Re: I know this is a bit of a stretch, but is there anyway to encode the Ei(x) function in JMP.

They're pretty much completely different languages.  If I have some free time (hah) I'll take a stab at converting it. 

stevedenham
Level II

Re: I know this is a bit of a stretch, but is there anyway to encode the Ei(x) function in JMP.

I think there is an R package that will do the integration.  Would that be easier to implement than re-coding?

Steve Denham

pmroz
Super User

Re: I know this is a bit of a stretch, but is there anyway to encode the Ei(x) function in JMP.

OK here's a JSL implementation of the Fortran code.  The code runs, but you'll need to test it out to make sure the numbers are good.  It's pretty much a straight conversion of the Fortran program.  Interesting exercise!

surfacethought
Level III

Re: I know this is a bit of a stretch, but is there anyway to encode the Ei(x) function in JMP.

PMroz,

This is incredible! It works flawlessly! This is certainly beer-worthy work, if you think of a way I can buy you one let me know

--SurfaceThought

Recommended Articles