I agree with @Victor_G 's reply. But to add just a bit more general advice...when I was tasked with doing any data analysis work with an eye towards modeling at some point in my problem solving process, I always started with plotting the data before any modeling. Which plots depends on the data for both responses and predictors, continuous, nominal, ordinal, etc. But this much I can tell you I always started with the Distribution platform so I had a sense of the following for both predictors and responses:
1. Where's the middle?
2. How spread out is the data?
3. What's the shape look like?
4. Is there anything funny, suspicious, or unusual that might make subsequent analysis problematic?
This last question can lead to all sorts of data clean up, recoding, outlier decisions, etc. One small example, suppose Traveler Citizenship is one of the predictors,,,and you pulled data from different databases...maybe one database has a Traveler's Citizenship as 'USA' another database, 'American'...well JMP is gonna treat this scenario as two different levels for citizenship...which is not how you want it treated I suspect?
So once my data is clean and good to go...then it was always off to at least some sort of scatter plotting of predictors vs. responses...multiple platforms in JMP for this, with lots of flexibility for visualization modification within. Graph Builder, Fit Y by X, Multivariate platforms all have useful features within.
Then looking at these plots and asking the following type questions:
1. Do these make physical sense?
2. Any relationships that look odd or suspicious?
3. Are there outliers that need further investigation?
4. What type of regression techniques might work?
5. Is there evidence of multicollinearity among the predictors?
Then based on the answers to these questions as long as the data still looks clean and reasonable...it's finally off to modeling.
Hope this helps?