cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Creating DOE (and fitting) for non-linear response

Hello,

 

I am still new to JMP but I'm trying to determine the best way to model a non-linear system (generating DOE + model fitting).

 

Context: Long story short, I have a large experimental space that I am trying to model (10 discrete variables + 10 continuous variables). Before I jump into my full experiment I'm working with a subset (1 discrete variable + 5 continuous variables) to make sure I'm modeling my system correctly before expanding my experimental space. 

 

I started by generating a DOE with a simple model containing main + 2nd Interaction terms + 2nd Power terms. After running the DOE I have a model that fit nicely where all effects are significant.

EndogenousCame1_0-1716234401980.png

 

As I play with the `Prediction Profiler` I know my model is over fitting certain sections of the data which are causing predictions that are not physically possible. My goal is to make a model that's as accurate as possible over my entire experimental space. Please see my screen shots below explaining some edge cases that are not being modeled accurately:

 

EndogenousCame1_0-1716236507266.png

EndogenousCame1_1-1716236515894.png

EndogenousCame1_2-1716236527212.png

 

 

Summary of where I currently stand:

- I know there is statistically significant curvature in my response (based on my first DOE)

- I know from physics that the response should asymptotically approach 0 as my continuous variables go to infinity (impossible for response to be negative)

- There are possibly some interaction terms but I'm wondering if those terms are also being used to overfit the curvature in my response. I need a bit more evidence before I believe there are significant interaction terms. 

 

My current model is accurate in 90% of scenarios, but I know there are some edge cases being generated because quadratic terms can't accurately model an asymptotic response. I assume that if I added more data points near the minima in the quadratic region the model would smooth out and more closely match reality but I want to minimize the number of data points required to get a good model (especially before I add more variables). What is the correct way to generate a DOE for an asymptotic response and once the DOE is generated, how do you model this non-linear response properly?

 

Thanks! 

 

 

 

0 REPLIES 0