cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Learn how to build custom Python data connectors and further customize JMP’s Data Connector Framework with the Python Data Connector Demo, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • See how to create experiments to support product design and ID useful product features. Register for June 12 webinar, 2pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Creating DOE (and fitting) for non-linear response

Hello,

 

I am still new to JMP but I'm trying to determine the best way to model a non-linear system (generating DOE + model fitting).

 

Context: Long story short, I have a large experimental space that I am trying to model (10 discrete variables + 10 continuous variables). Before I jump into my full experiment I'm working with a subset (1 discrete variable + 5 continuous variables) to make sure I'm modeling my system correctly before expanding my experimental space. 

 

I started by generating a DOE with a simple model containing main + 2nd Interaction terms + 2nd Power terms. After running the DOE I have a model that fit nicely where all effects are significant.

EndogenousCame1_0-1716234401980.png

 

As I play with the `Prediction Profiler` I know my model is over fitting certain sections of the data which are causing predictions that are not physically possible. My goal is to make a model that's as accurate as possible over my entire experimental space. Please see my screen shots below explaining some edge cases that are not being modeled accurately:

 

EndogenousCame1_0-1716236507266.png

EndogenousCame1_1-1716236515894.png

EndogenousCame1_2-1716236527212.png

 

 

Summary of where I currently stand:

- I know there is statistically significant curvature in my response (based on my first DOE)

- I know from physics that the response should asymptotically approach 0 as my continuous variables go to infinity (impossible for response to be negative)

- There are possibly some interaction terms but I'm wondering if those terms are also being used to overfit the curvature in my response. I need a bit more evidence before I believe there are significant interaction terms. 

 

My current model is accurate in 90% of scenarios, but I know there are some edge cases being generated because quadratic terms can't accurately model an asymptotic response. I assume that if I added more data points near the minima in the quadratic region the model would smooth out and more closely match reality but I want to minimize the number of data points required to get a good model (especially before I add more variables). What is the correct way to generate a DOE for an asymptotic response and once the DOE is generated, how do you model this non-linear response properly?

 

Thanks! 

 

 

 

0 REPLIES 0

Recommended Articles