Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Normality Test

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Apr 12, 2017 11:49 AM
(13370 views)

Normality test is based on the data residual but I confuse how to test the normality in JMP.

Should I calculate the residual first and then test the normality?

or just straight away test the raw data?

Thanks

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Check this one-page guide out

https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Academic-Knowledge-Base/Assessing-Normality-OPG/ta-p/23407

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

To add to my colleague Lou Valente's contribution above, if I'm interpreting your question as 'When in the analysis workflow sequence should I test for normality of (something)?' The answer is largely dependent on the practical questions you are trying to answer AND the analysis methods you are employing to answer them. For example, if your ultimate goal is to say, calculate process capability indices, some indices are fairly sensitive to the normality assumption so testing the raw data for normality BEFORE any analysis is generally considered a worthwhile few minutes spent.

On the other hand, lets say you are analyzing a designed experiment and (especially if you made this cardinal DOE execution mistake) you failed to run the experiment in random order. Then you may have had a nuisance/noise factor (machine warm up effect let's say as an example) whose influence you'd like to be able to detect if in fact it rose up to influence your results, then a time series plot of experimental execution order and the residuals (which means you've got to fit a model first) is warranted as your first line of defense in detecting the presence of the nuisance variable.

2 REPLIES 2

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Check this one-page guide out

https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Academic-Knowledge-Base/Assessing-Normality-OPG/ta-p/23407

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

To add to my colleague Lou Valente's contribution above, if I'm interpreting your question as 'When in the analysis workflow sequence should I test for normality of (something)?' The answer is largely dependent on the practical questions you are trying to answer AND the analysis methods you are employing to answer them. For example, if your ultimate goal is to say, calculate process capability indices, some indices are fairly sensitive to the normality assumption so testing the raw data for normality BEFORE any analysis is generally considered a worthwhile few minutes spent.

On the other hand, lets say you are analyzing a designed experiment and (especially if you made this cardinal DOE execution mistake) you failed to run the experiment in random order. Then you may have had a nuisance/noise factor (machine warm up effect let's say as an example) whose influence you'd like to be able to detect if in fact it rose up to influence your results, then a time series plot of experimental execution order and the residuals (which means you've got to fit a model first) is warranted as your first line of defense in detecting the presence of the nuisance variable.

Article Labels

There are no labels assigned to this post.