Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Concatenate: option to specify column name match

☐ cool new feature
☑ could help many users!

☑removes something that feels like a „bug“

☐ nice to have

☐ nobody needs it


What inspired this wish list request? 

In general, Jmp doesn't distinguish between upper and lower case - and Jmp ignores white spaces in Symbol names.
So, :age can refer to the same column as :A G E 

But :age and  :A G E can be also different columns.

check if column exists? 


JSL ignores white-spacing for names, most people don't take advantage of this! 


Let's take the Concatenate platform as an example. This platform is very picky with column names.

If Table A has a column :age and table B has a column :A G E,the combined table will contain 2 columns!

In general this is a nice feature: better split the columns, the user can merge them later.


But for user who lived the carefree life of "difference don't matter" - the first collision with Concatenate can be traumatic.


What is the improvement you would like to see? 

In Concatenate (and other platforms?) please provide an option "Column Names: Exact match".

If the option is on, Concatenate is as picky as now, if it's off, Concatenate follows the usual rules of JMP/JSL when comparing column names.



Why is this idea important? 

- The option will give the user more possibilities.


- The presence of the option will generate awareness!


- The idea is related to the option Exact Match (1 |0) of   dt << has column(), which will be introduced with Jmp18:
data table : message column exists(colname)? 



more wishes by  hogi_2-1702196401638.png