cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-474750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3ESuffixe%20du%20nom%20de%20la%20table%20JMP%20en%20fonction%20de%20l'action%20%C3%A0%20entreprendre%20pour%20produire%20une%20nouvelle%20table%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-474750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3ELors%20de%20l'empilement%20ou%20du%20fractionnement%20d'une%20table%2C%20est-il%20possible%20de%20d%C3%A9finir%20le%20nom%20de%20la%20table%20de%20sortie%20par%20d%C3%A9faut%20%3D%20Table%20de%20donn%C3%A9es%20actuelle%20%7C%7C%20%22.%22%20%7C%7C%20%22Split%22%20ou%20%22Stack%22%20%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EC'est%20un%20changement%20relativement%20minime%2C%20mais%20je%20pense%20que%20cela%20aiderait%20beaucoup%20lorsqu'il%20s'agit%20de%20g%C3%A9rer%20de%20nombreuses%20tables%20%C3%A0%20la%20fois.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-474750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EFusion%20et%20nettoyage%20des%20donn%C3%A9es%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

JMP Table Name Suffix depending on action to produce new table

When Stacking or Splitting a table is it possible to make the default Output Table Name = Current Data Table || "." || "Split" or "Stack" ?

Relatively small change but think it would help a lot when dealing with a lot of tables at one time.