cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-249081%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EMiglioramento%20dei%20test%20di%20equivalenza%20nell'adattamento%20Y%20di%20X%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-249081%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EIl%20suggerimento%20sarebbe%20quello%20di%20consentire%20una%20soluzione%20automatica%20per%20il%20valore%20di%20differenza%20che%20fornisce%20l'equivalenza%20per%20un%20dato%20alfa.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ENell'esempio%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmp.com%2Fsupport%2Fhelp%2Fen%2F15.0%2Fjmp%2Fexample-of-an-equivalence-test.shtml%23%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3E%20esempio-di-un-test-di-equivalenza%3C%2FA%3E%20ci%20sarebbe%20un'opzione%20per%20risolvere%20il%20valore%20della%20differenza%20che%20prevede%20l'equivalenza%20per%20un%20dato%20valore%20alfa%20(si%20aggiunge%20all'opzione%20corrente%20per%20fornire%20una%20differenza%20specifica).%20Molte%20volte%20questo%20valore%20di%20differenza%20%C3%A8%20specificato%20in%20modo%20incoerente%20all'interno%20di%20un%20dato%20dipartimento%20o%20gruppo%20funzionale%20(spesso%20con%20molte%20opinioni%20divergenti).Quindi%2C%20invece%20di%20eseguire%20pi%C3%B9%20differenze%20per%20mostrare%20i%20valori%20p%20per%20l'equivalenza%2C%20lo%20sarebbe%3CEM%3E%3CSTRONG%3E%20molto%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FEM%3E%20conveniente%20risolvere%20la%20differenza%20che%20predirebbe%20l'equivalenza%20dato%20un%20valore%20alfa.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-249081%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EStatistiche%20e%20analisi%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EInterfaccia%20utente%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-392849%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EOggetto%3A%20Migliorare%20i%20test%20di%20equivalenza%20nell'adattamento%20Y%20di%20X%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-392849%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EConcordo%20sul%20fatto%20che%20un%20back-solver%20sarebbe%20utile%2C%20ma%20va%20contro%20l'intento%20di%20un%20test%20di%20equivalenza%20che%20%C3%A8%20quello%20di%20specificare%20una%20soglia%20di%20differenza%20pratica%3CEM%3E%20Prima%3C%2FEM%3E%20eseguire%20l'esperimento.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EQuesto%20%C3%A8%20un%20po'%20come%20scegliere%20la%20differenza%20pratica%20per%20%22passare%22.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-250299%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EOggetto%3A%20Migliorare%20i%20test%20di%20equivalenza%20nell'adattamento%20Y%20di%20X%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-250299%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESe%20hai%20un%20alpha%3D.05%2C%20un%20intervallo%20di%20confidenza%20del%2090%25%20sulla%20differenza%20nelle%20medie%20tra%202%20gruppi%20si%20allineer%C3%A0%20con%20il%20valore%20della%20differenza%20limite%20specificato.%20All'interno%20della%20piattaforma%20Fit%20Y%20by%20X%20%C3%A8%20possibile%20modificare%20il%20livello%20alfa%20per%20dire%20.10%20e%20utilizzare%20il%20test%20t%20appropriato%20per%20effettuare%20tale%20confronto%20nel%20set%20di%20dati%20di%20Big%20Class.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20generale%2C%20tuttavia%2C%20non%20%C3%A8%20una%20buona%20pratica%20ottenere%20l'intervallo%20di%20confidenza%2C%20quindi%20determinare%20se%20quel%20livello%20di%20differenza%20%C3%A8%20significativo%20o%20meno.%20Non%20posso%20dire%20dal%20tuo%20thread%20se%20questo%20dibattito%20si%20verifica%20prima%20o%20dopo%20che%20i%20dati%20si%20verificano%3B%20naturalmente%20vogliamo%20che%20sia%20concordato%20in%20anticipo%20in%20modo%20che%20quando%20i%20dati%20tornano%20il%20gruppo%20possa%20essere%20ritenuto%20responsabile%20della%20soglia%20preselezionata.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
0 Kudos

Improving Equivalence Tests in Fit Y by X

Suggestion would be to allow an automatic solve for the difference value that gives equivalence for a given alpha.

In the example example-of-an-equivalence-test there would be an option to solve for the difference value that predicts equivalence for a given alpha value (it addition to the current option for supplying a specific difference).   Many times this difference value is specified inconsistently among a given department or functional group (often with many differing opinions).  So, instead of running multiple differences to show the p-values for equivalence it would be very convenient to solve for the difference that would predict equivalence given an alpha value.

2 Comments
jszarka
Level V

If you have an alpha=.05, a 90% confidence interval on the difference in means between 2 groups will align with the boundary difference value you specify. Within the Fit Y by X platform you can change the alpha level to say .10 and use the appropriate t-test for making that comparison in the Big Class data set.

 

In general though, it's not a good practice to get the confidence interval then determine whether or not that difference level is meaningful. I can't tell from your thread whether this debate occurs before or after the data occurs; naturally we want that agreed upon in advance so that when the data comes back the group can be held accountable to the preselected threshold.

I agree that a back-solver would be handy but it goes against the intent of an equivalence test which is to specify a practical difference threshold before running the experiment.  

This is kind of like cherry-picking the practical difference to "pass."