What inspired this wish list request? Control Chart Builder, even as of JMP18, will by default order the Subgroup alphanumerically if character. Sometimes the Subgroup item like "LotID" is not in alphanumeric order according to the actual timestamp. If timestamp is used instead as numeric, the order is correct, but it is scaling timestamp, and sometimes points are on top of each other, instead of in sequence as a typical SPC chart from the past is shown. If you change timestamp to character, the AM/PM part of the time stamp gets out of order if using this date/time format.
For example, in this random data, the LotID is in alphanumeric order. But the actual first lot to run is 9013108 on 01/30. Trying to make the CCB with LotID is not the right order, and using the timestamp column makes the data clump up sometimes.
LotID |
Time |
9013101 |
01/31/2021 2:50:16 AM |
9013102 |
01/31/2021 2:18:22 AM |
9013103 |
01/31/2021 2:35:41 PM |
9013106 |
01/31/2021 12:45:53 AM |
9013107 |
01/31/2021 6:34:31 AM |
9013108 |
01/30/2021 3:59:54 PM |
9013109 |
01/31/2021 5:49:05 AM |
9020104 |
02/01/2021 3:03:20 AM |
9020106 |
01/31/2021 11:30:52 PM |
What is the improvement you would like to see? Allow user for a timestamp column to select either the x-axis scaled (to look for gaps in time) or to plot sequentially. This is because the traditional SPC chart is plotted in time order, but each point is added sequentially, and not scaled to time. This prevents pile up of data points for when sampling was high and it is hard to see individual points, and wide gaps when sampling was low. But sometimes a user wants to see those gaps to see how the material was sampled.
Why is this idea important? Since Control Chart Builder is a platform just for SPC charts, it should allow easy use of the Subgroup axis for time, lot numbers, etc. This also prevents having to use the "Edit Value Order" and use "Row Order Levels", to plot the timestamp sequentially. See Case Number TS-00206416 for details.