This website uses Cookies. Click Accept to agree to our website's cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy. Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Registration open for Discovery Summit Europe. User Group Members benefit from a 25% discount with the code: DSEUgroup24
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
JDore
JDore
Visitor

Variance Components

Feb 12, 2019 11:40 AM (2902 views)

From a statistical viewpoint, what are the dangers with treating a negative variance from the EMS method as zero? And why would you use REML or Bayesian Instead?

0 Kudos
1 REPLY 1
ian_jmp
Staff ian_jmp
Staff

Re: Variance Components

Feb 13, 2019 05:38 AM (2882 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from JDore 02-12-2019

For EMS vs REML, take a look here, particularly the section ''REML vs. EMS . . . '. For the Bayesian approach used in JMP, see Laura's 2015 Discovery paper.

0 Kudos