cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Sign-in to the JMP Community will be unavailable intermittently Dec. 6-7 due to a system update. Thank you for your understanding!
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
  • JMP 19 is here! Learn more about the new features.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
gene
Level III

partial least squares for binary response, PLS-DA

I'm using JMP Pro PLS, but my response is binary.  I've seen an approach, PLS-DA that does the math in a different way recognizing that the predictors and the responses are not of the same type and so the notion of covariance between them is different than if they were both numeric.  I have only skimmed the literature before taking a deeper dive.  I thought JMP would use an approach specifically designed for binary responses.  However, in the notes for PLS in JMP Pro, when the response is binary the notes indicate that the response is simply coded to 0/1 and then the algorithm proceeds as if it were a continuous response.  Is the solution impacted by this method?  That is, is it close to the same solution as PLS-DA?

1 REPLY 1
gene
Level III

Re: partial least squares for binary response, PLS-DA

At this point it appears that at least some of the papers about PLS-DA treat binary responses the same as continuous.  They code to 0/1 and move on.  They state that no assumptions are made about the distribution of the responses, so, in effect, no assumptions are explicitly violated by coding.  I suppose there would be an additional step to set a threshold for classification.

Recommended Articles