Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- cpK/ppk

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 23, 2017 5:21 AM
(723 views)

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 23, 2017 1:00 PM
(1378 views)

Solution

Correct? That's a different question. The 'correctness' of an approach is dependent on many aspects to the process capability analysis problem. For example: 1. Does your process data exhibit any evidence of assignable cause variation? 2. Does your data appear to be normally distributed? The answer to these questions influences the approach that is optimal for calculating process capability indices over and above the sheer mathematics associated with the reference in my first reply.

3 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 23, 2017 12:56 PM
(700 views)

Here's a reference for you in the JMP Online Documentation.

http://www.jmp.com/support/help/13/Capability_Analysis_2.shtml#1161749

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 23, 2017 1:00 PM
(1379 views)

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 24, 2017 2:59 AM
(680 views)

Thank You

Data are normal distributed with no assignable cause variation. I assume the answer I was looking for (found in Process Capability in JMP 2012) is that if I do not group data JMP will automatically use moving range subgroup size 2 to calculate cpk.

KR