Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Discussions
- :
- What formula does JMP use to calculate single-prop...

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

May 25, 2009 4:58 PM
(979 views)

Can someone tell me how JMP calculates single-proportion sample size? That is, what is the underlying formula?

Most importantly why is it different from the "usual" published formula?

for example that used on the online calculator:

http://www.stat.ubc.ca/~rollin/stats/ssize/b1.html

and detailed here:

http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section2/prc242.htm

For example (JMP8)

with p0 = 0.1, p1 = 0.4, alpha = 0.05, 1-sided test, power = 0.8

JMP8 gives sample size = 7 (actually 6.183 - rounded up to whole number 7)

"usual" formula gives sample size = 10 (actually 9.116 - rounded up to whole number 10)

Thanks

I've changed the example so it was relevant to JMP8 (which only does 1-sided one-proportion sample size tests - or is there another way to do 2-sided?)

Message was edited by: reedme

Most importantly why is it different from the "usual" published formula?

for example that used on the online calculator:

http://www.stat.ubc.ca/~rollin/stats/ssize/b1.html

and detailed here:

http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section2/prc242.htm

For example (JMP8)

with p0 = 0.1, p1 = 0.4, alpha = 0.05, 1-sided test, power = 0.8

JMP8 gives sample size = 7 (actually 6.183 - rounded up to whole number 7)

"usual" formula gives sample size = 10 (actually 9.116 - rounded up to whole number 10)

Thanks

I've changed the example so it was relevant to JMP8 (which only does 1-sided one-proportion sample size tests - or is there another way to do 2-sided?)

Message was edited by: reedme

2 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Aug 7, 2009 3:02 AM
(922 views)

I am very interested in seeing a response from SAS to this poster's question. I also have seen inconsistencies in the several calculations for proportions data, especially when dealing with small p (<1%). I think JMP may be using the normal approximation, which may be okay for proportions you would see in marketing studies, but makes the software relatively useless for Six Sigma. At this point, given these inconsistencies I am seriously considering switching my group over to Minitab.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Aug 27, 2009 1:33 PM
(922 views)

JMP 8.0.1 does an Exact calculation. The 2 references you give use a normal approximation calculation. (The JMP docs say JMP is using a normal approximation but they are being updated.)

When I use 8.0.1 to calculate the sample size for the example you give, I get sample size = 13 (not 7). This agrees with the Exact calculation performed at this excellent power and sample size page: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power/.

Michael

When I use 8.0.1 to calculate the sample size for the example you give, I get sample size = 13 (not 7). This agrees with the Exact calculation performed at this excellent power and sample size page: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power/.

Michael