Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Number of runs for a 4-factors DSD

Topic Options

- Start Article
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Aug 21, 2015 2:25 AM
(4270 views)

Hi,

When using JMP11, the number of runs for a 4-factors DSD is N=9.

With JMP12, N=13.

Any reason for this?

Thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

I believe the number of recommended runs for this very powerful new screening design have evolved based upon experience. In general screening designs imply many factors and the power of the DSD's is experienced by leveraging the effect sparsity principle. With low numbers of factors there is a better chance that effect sparsity will not hold and you will need additional experiments to delineate the model. A better scenario would be to brainstorm an additional 2 factors since the number of experimental runs would be the same (13).

2 REPLIES 2

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Re: Number of runs for a 4-factors DSD

With the 9-run design, it is difficult to separate second-order effects. If you look in the comments of Why definitive screening designs are definitive, Bradley Jones discusses this in some detail. Due to this, we made the change in JMP 12 to give the larger design for 4 or fewer factors.