Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Aug 11, 2019 7:32 AM
(2636 views)

Hi together,

I`m struggling with the design of a gauge R&R analysis. Maybe some of you could advise me on this.

When my process produces different products with different specifications and all products are controlled by the same gauge.

Does it make sense or is it common to conduct one gauge R&R analysis including the different parts from the different products?

Or is it common to test the reliability of the gauge considering only parts from the same product?

Many thanks in advance!

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

I assume you mean all products are **measured** by the same gage? There are a number of options to conduct a gage study:

1. Take multiple parts and measure the same dimension with the same gage multiple times (often with multiple inspectors),

2. Take multiple dimensions from multiple parts and normalize the difference in the dimensions(e.g., use the delta Target-actual)

3. But, what questions do you have about the measurement system? What conclusions do you wish to draw from the study and over what inference space do you wish to draw those conclusions?

So for example, you question whether operator technique biases the measurement, you would need to include mutiple inspectors in the study, If you question whether environmental factors effect gage variability, you would need to study the gage over changing ambient conditions. If you would like to be able to determine if the gage can assess within part variation, you would need multiple measure within part, if part-to-part variation is of concern, then multiple patrts, if lot-to-lot variation is of interest, the parts must come from multiple lots.

I suggest you get Wheeler and Lyday's Evaluating the Measurement Process for further information. Referenmced in the JMP White Paper https://www.jmp.com/en_in/whitepapers/jmp/emp-management-systems-analysis.html

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Thanky you very much. The webinar helped a lot!

3 REPLIES 3

Highlighted
##

The experimental design can be created using either framework. If you use parts from only one product, then your design would have not tell you anything about the other products. You can incorporate the different products and if you create the products as a level in the design, then you'll have information about parts, nested within the products. Other considerations are typically operators, crossing parts/products across the design etc. You may want to take a quick look at this on demand webinar I created during my tenure in the JMP division of SAS.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Re: Measurement System Analysis Approach

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Thanky you very much. The webinar helped a lot!

Highlighted

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

I assume you mean all products are **measured** by the same gage? There are a number of options to conduct a gage study:

1. Take multiple parts and measure the same dimension with the same gage multiple times (often with multiple inspectors),

2. Take multiple dimensions from multiple parts and normalize the difference in the dimensions(e.g., use the delta Target-actual)

3. But, what questions do you have about the measurement system? What conclusions do you wish to draw from the study and over what inference space do you wish to draw those conclusions?

So for example, you question whether operator technique biases the measurement, you would need to include mutiple inspectors in the study, If you question whether environmental factors effect gage variability, you would need to study the gage over changing ambient conditions. If you would like to be able to determine if the gage can assess within part variation, you would need multiple measure within part, if part-to-part variation is of concern, then multiple patrts, if lot-to-lot variation is of interest, the parts must come from multiple lots.

I suggest you get Wheeler and Lyday's Evaluating the Measurement Process for further information. Referenmced in the JMP White Paper https://www.jmp.com/en_in/whitepapers/jmp/emp-management-systems-analysis.html

Article Labels

There are no labels assigned to this post.