My question is how JMP controls the display of panels of Interaction Profiles plots that correspond to factors not included in the associated model.
Does JMP consistently display such panels differently from panels corresponding to factors that are included?
I would like to distinguish factors included and omitted (within the model) on JMP Interaction Profiles. In my experience this operation is done automatically in some cases but not others.
In the first screenshot(1-No_distinction) I've manually indicated the terms included in the model with asterisks (*).
JMP did not distinguish the display of the panels based on inclusion of factors.
In a different JMP workbook the plots corresponding to factors not included in the model are dashed lines and appear with dimmed intensity (2-With_distinction).
I believe to have uncovered the source of the inconsistency. I have reproducibly generated the following outcomes:
Outcome 1: Gray-out display properties as desired:
Interaction Profiles must be “requested” in the JMP dialog via the drop-down for the Response as shown in the screenshot cursor:
--------------
Outcome 2: Gray-out display properties are not implemented, leading to inconsistency with respect to the terms included in the model:
Interaction Profiles are “requested” in the JMP dialog via the drop-down for the Prediction Profiler, a sub-item of the Response.
In the screenshot for Outcome 2, it the AC AD AE plots are not grayed out.
In fact, both modes of Interaction Profile panels can be displayed simultaneously.
In summary to have the gray-out/dashed line display consistently dependent on the inclusion of respective interaction terms in the model the Interaction Profile panel apparently must be activated from the Factor Profiling menu for the Response.