Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- How to test for non-additivity in a 3 factors RCBD...

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 8, 2017 6:32 PM
(587 views)

As mentioned in the title. The three factors are entry, location, and year.

Don't know how to test for non-additivity in JMP? Thank you!

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 9, 2017 5:55 AM
(1134 views)

4 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 9, 2017 5:41 AM
(573 views)

What do you mean by 'non-additivity?'

I suspect that it means the presences of effects in the response that are not only the additive main effects. If that guess is correct, then include cross-terms to test for interactions.

Learn it once, use it forever!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 9, 2017 5:50 AM
(571 views)

I am trying to see of the 3 factors are additive in the model.

Do you mean through running a full factorial ANOVA including 2way and 3way interactions, if any of the interactions terms are significant, the additivity of the three factors are not accepted ?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 9, 2017 5:55 AM
(1135 views)

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 9, 2017 6:02 AM
(564 views)