cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
PValueEnemy
Level II

How to design a DoE to compare appliances with different batch size

Hello!

I want to compare if two machines have the same pressure output. However, one machine, namely A, outputs batches of size 15 and machine B output batches of size 90.

Ideally, my model would be

y_ijk = mu + m_i + m_i/b_ij + e_ijk

where y is the pressure at machine i, batch j and replicate k, m is the machine, b is the batch and e is the random error.

How would I create this design in JMP, making sure I have the correct number of observations in each block (batch)?

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Victor_G
Super User

Re: How to design a DoE to compare appliances with different batch size

Hi @PValueEnemy,

 

Have you tried looking at the "MSA Design" platform (in "DoE" -> "Special Purpose" -> "MSA Design") ?

Regarding your topic and the nesting between batch and machine, I think the platform may be able to handle your constraint.
Here is an example with factor batch nested within factor machines, and other possible factors :

 

Victor_G_0-1685082797076.png

Here is the JSL code :


DOE(
	MSA Design,
	{Add Response( None, "Y", ., ., . ), Add Factor(
		Categorical,
		{"L1", "L2"},
		"Machine",
		MSA( 3, 1 )
	), Add Factor(
		Categorical,
		{"L1", "L2", "L3", "L4", "L5", "L6", "L7", "L8", "L9", "L10", "L11", "L12",
		"L13", "L14", "L15"},
		"Batch",
		MSA( 2, 1 )
	), Add Factor( Categorical, {"L1", "L2", "L3"}, "Operator", MSA( 4, 1 ) ),
	Set Random Seed( 72339109 ), Replicates( 2, 1 ),
	Nesting Structure( {"Machine", {"Batch"}} || "Operator" ), Make Design,
	Simulate Responses( 0 )}
);

You can start your design with this platform, and if needed manually add batch replicates or rows on your datatable to account for the difference between batch sizes for the two machines.

 

I hope this idea may help you,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
MRB3855
Super User

Re: How to design a DoE to compare appliances with different batch size

@PValueEnemy  Some of your model notation is not clear to me. In particular, what exactly does “m_i/b_ij” represent?

PValueEnemy
Level II

Re: How to design a DoE to compare appliances with different batch size

m_i/b_ij is the effect of the batch j nested in the machine i. Hope it is clearer now

Victor_G
Super User

Re: How to design a DoE to compare appliances with different batch size

Hi @PValueEnemy,

 

Have you tried looking at the "MSA Design" platform (in "DoE" -> "Special Purpose" -> "MSA Design") ?

Regarding your topic and the nesting between batch and machine, I think the platform may be able to handle your constraint.
Here is an example with factor batch nested within factor machines, and other possible factors :

 

Victor_G_0-1685082797076.png

Here is the JSL code :


DOE(
	MSA Design,
	{Add Response( None, "Y", ., ., . ), Add Factor(
		Categorical,
		{"L1", "L2"},
		"Machine",
		MSA( 3, 1 )
	), Add Factor(
		Categorical,
		{"L1", "L2", "L3", "L4", "L5", "L6", "L7", "L8", "L9", "L10", "L11", "L12",
		"L13", "L14", "L15"},
		"Batch",
		MSA( 2, 1 )
	), Add Factor( Categorical, {"L1", "L2", "L3"}, "Operator", MSA( 4, 1 ) ),
	Set Random Seed( 72339109 ), Replicates( 2, 1 ),
	Nesting Structure( {"Machine", {"Batch"}} || "Operator" ), Make Design,
	Simulate Responses( 0 )}
);

You can start your design with this platform, and if needed manually add batch replicates or rows on your datatable to account for the difference between batch sizes for the two machines.

 

I hope this idea may help you,

Victor GUILLER

"It is not unusual for a well-designed experiment to analyze itself" (Box, Hunter and Hunter)
statman
Super User

Re: How to design a DoE to compare appliances with different batch size

I'm not sure that experimentation is your best method for this study.  Lots of questions:

 

What is a batch?  What is the appliance?  Why would pressure output depend on batch size? Is there a "known" relationship between batch size and pressure? Must you use all batches? How much of a change in pressure output is of interest?  Is the pressure output from either machine consistent? (If not, no comparison should be made)?  Has the measurement system been studied?  I believe you might be better off doing a sampling study where you take multiple measures of pressure over time (the length of the study and the frequency of the measures should be a function of SME hypotheses as to why the pressure would vary in time).  Batches are nested within machine and will be confounded with measurement error.  

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box