Brad Jones and Chris Nachtsheim published the paper in the Journal of Quality Technology Vol. 43, No. 1, January 2011.
I agree...I think it was JMP11.
Is there a presentation/paper that explain the difference between the definitive screening design and the standard screening design. I am currently using JMP 5 version
I did a simple search of the JMP web site, and found the following:
It has a couple of webcasts and links to a slide presentation and to the original paper by Grad Jones from JMP and Chris Nachtsheim from the Univ. of Minn.
I think there were scripts/Add Ins starting to populate the JMP universe when version 10 was the current release? Don't hold me to it though...
JMP 11 incorporates Definitive Screening Design capabilities that handle continuous factors and 2-level categorical factors. This add-in provides similar capabilities for JMP 9 and JMP 10.
I don't think the Add-in has been updated though, so it's missing a bunch of refinements to DSD's that have come since version 11. Most notably the 2 step forward selection algorithm in JMP 13. The DSD's are incredible in their own right, but it's the analysis method that is the real secret sauce for the workflow.
@albiruni81 if you are doing Experimental Design and need to do screening it's absolutely a tool you need in your kit. Also, if you're still running JMP 5, there are so many reasons to update: Graph Builder, The Screening Platforms... There are too many to list.
To pile onto my colleague Mike Anderson's comment on adding DSDs to your screening design tool kit...I'm reminded of one of JMP's Analytically Speaking webinars where Stu Hunter commented something akin to, "...DSDs render 2**(k-p) RES III and IV designs essentially obsolete..." Nuff said.
There are no labels assigned to this post.