turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Coding of non-equally spaced variables for Response Surface Model

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Jul 8, 2014 4:07 PM
(1116 views)

Hi there,

I am using a Response Surface Design with 3 levels for each factor. The factor levels are not equally spaced because I chose the values of the factors at the centre point so that the response is approx 50% of the range that I am exploring. I have two doubts:

1) Choosing the factor values for centre point to give 50% of the response range is the right way?

2) Is there any guidelines to code the factors when they are not equally spaced?

Thank you in advance

3 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Jul 8, 2014 6:57 PM
(1018 views)

Have you investigated the use of discrete numeric factors in the custom design platform. Many times we deal with factors that are numeric however they are not easily set at specific values due to operational considerations. We have the capability in the custom design platform to have a "discete numeric" choice so that such a scenario can be dealt with successfully.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Jul 9, 2014 8:01 AM
(1018 views)

Dear LouV,

Thank you for your response. I have been shortly exploring the use of discrete numeric factors. Nevertheless, in the case that I am analysing my factors are continuous, so I do not have the limitation of discrete values.

I might posed my question in the wrong way. My question is:

the values of the factors at centre point of CDD design should be at the mean value of the range of factors?

or the values of the factors at the centre point should give a 50% of variation of response respect to the range that it is being explored?

Thank you again.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Jul 9, 2014 10:37 AM
(1018 views)

It could be my confusion but I like to think of the Response Surface Design as a two-level design with center points which is what I believe you mean when you say three levels (-1, 0,+1). The values of the factors at the center point should be at the mean value of the range of factors.