cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • We’re improving the Learn JMP page, and want your feedback! Take the survey
  • JMP monthly Newswire gives user tips and learning events. Subscribe
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
AlbertoJD2000
Level II

Can Testing slices in JMP Pro Mixed Model?

Hello, I am doing a 4-way, full factorial ANOVA with one repeated measures factor (time, 3 samplings) and three between-subject factors (species, color, and irrigation; 2 levels of each) using the Mixed Model personality in JMP Pro 18.1.0. I'm using the AR(1) repeated covariance structure, as it provides the best fit based on AICc values. The analysis indicates I have no significant 4- or 3-way interactions, but multiple 2-way interactions (see below).

JHS_0-1746626039056.png

To investigate the 2-way interactions, I would like to, for example, do a Tukey's means separation for time period at each level of species and t-test for species at each time period. However, I'm not interested in all pairwise comparisons in the species x time period interaction (i.e., comparing species 1 at time 1 to species 2 at time 3 is not meaningful), and I would like to avoid diluting my statistical power if possible. The User-Defined Estimates won't work in this scenario because it requires the user to select at least one level of each factor, including those not in the interaction of interest. If I'm investigating the species x time period interaction, values should be averaged across all levels of color and irrigation. Essentially, I want to test slices, but that doesn't seem to be an option in the Mixed Model output, and I cannot analyze these data in the Standard Least Squares personality because I'm using the AR(1) structure for the repeated measures. Do you have any advice on analyzing the simple effects in this scenario?

1 REPLY 1

Re: Can Testing slices in JMP Pro Mixed Model?

Before getting too far into analysis that includes the structure, do you have a rational basis besides the AICc value for accepting the AR(1) structure? In other words, does the suggestion of auto-regression in the data (lagging by 1 row) make you say something like "Yeah, that makes sense because of xyz"?

 

The video at this link might be helpful, starting at around the 25-26 minute mark.

Recommended Articles