<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to build a prediction model of multi-step process: some runs don't have all the steps in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/799605#M97550</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Since you are data mining, you can try different approaches. &amp;nbsp;The one you suggest is worth a try. &amp;nbsp;Create a column and call it "steps", then fill out accordingly. &amp;nbsp;Once this is done you can look for the effect of "steps", you can run regression procedures &lt;STRONG&gt;by&lt;/STRONG&gt; "steps", do lots of data plots within and between steps, etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-17T16:25:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to build a prediction model of multi-step process: some runs don't have all the steps</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/798860#M97486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am hoping to get some advice in modelling based on the historical data. For the process the model is based on, it has 3 steps dep1-&amp;gt;dep2-&amp;gt;etch3, for each step there are 3 continuous factors. So in total, I have 3*3 factors, 9 factors. However, for some historical runs, there is no step 3etch but 1 and 2. Could I take the "3 steps run" and "2 steps run" as one table and build model out of it? Should I put "0" for step 3 factors for when there is no step 3?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes, it could also be dep1-&amp;gt;etch2-&amp;gt;dep3, which is different from&amp;nbsp;dep1-&amp;gt;dep2-&amp;gt;etch3. Is JMP able to deal with this kinds of multi-step DOE...?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/798860#M97486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fruit325</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-14T08:01:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a prediction model of multi-step process: some runs don't have all the steps</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/798992#M97494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry, just not enough information to provide specific advice. &amp;nbsp;Here are my thoughts, though you may not like tyhem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since you are using only historical data, the best you can do is data mine. (look for patterns in the data and possible association of factors to develop hypotheses). &amp;nbsp;Historical data lacks context. &amp;nbsp;There's too much information not included in your data set to create any useful prediction models. &amp;nbsp;Now, you might get clues to develop hypotheses that can be tested with experimental design, but that would be the extent. &amp;nbsp;For example, though you don't provide what the response variables are, do you know the measurements errors associated with the x's and the y's? &amp;nbsp;Are there other factors not recorded that varied over the time period of your historical data. &amp;nbsp;Are the x's collinear? &amp;nbsp;Do x's have a lagged effect?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just use data plots and regression (e.g., stepwise, PLS maybe even PCA) to get clues to help you design an experiment to provide some confidence in a useful model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 17:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/798992#M97494</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-15T17:30:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a prediction model of multi-step process: some runs don't have all the steps</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/799561#M97544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4358"&gt;@statman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your advice! That's true that for historical data there are so many noises from the measurement, time effects, etc. for modelling and according to your advice I am going to do some data mining to try to pick up the important factors that would be helpful to build next orthogonal DOE.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is.... because the historical runs, some have only two process steps, some have three process steps, how could I combine these two senarios into one to be analyzed? Can I put "0" for those factors in the 3rd step for the runs where there are only two steps? Thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/799561#M97544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fruit325</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T13:36:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to build a prediction model of multi-step process: some runs don't have all the steps</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/799605#M97550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since you are data mining, you can try different approaches. &amp;nbsp;The one you suggest is worth a try. &amp;nbsp;Create a column and call it "steps", then fill out accordingly. &amp;nbsp;Once this is done you can look for the effect of "steps", you can run regression procedures &lt;STRONG&gt;by&lt;/STRONG&gt; "steps", do lots of data plots within and between steps, etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-build-a-prediction-model-of-multi-step-process-some-runs/m-p/799605#M97550</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-17T16:25:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

