<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Analysis tool for comparing the performance of media and feed for CHO cell in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-tool-for-comparing-the-performance-of-media-and-feed/m-p/797589#M97344</link>
    <description>Hi everyone,&lt;BR /&gt;I am evaluating different media and feeds on CHO cell clone for selection of best combination which result in desired product quality.&lt;BR /&gt;After performing fed batches with combination, I have many data point and would like to use tool to get the best performing condition in compare to innovator product quality. Earlier I used clustering but I didn't get meaningful insights because it is also considering the other parameters (undesired) which contributing in clustering making it but confusing.&lt;BR /&gt;Any experience with such case study,plz reply.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:55:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manishkumar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-10T17:55:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis tool for comparing the performance of media and feed for CHO cell</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-tool-for-comparing-the-performance-of-media-and-feed/m-p/797589#M97344</link>
      <description>Hi everyone,&lt;BR /&gt;I am evaluating different media and feeds on CHO cell clone for selection of best combination which result in desired product quality.&lt;BR /&gt;After performing fed batches with combination, I have many data point and would like to use tool to get the best performing condition in compare to innovator product quality. Earlier I used clustering but I didn't get meaningful insights because it is also considering the other parameters (undesired) which contributing in clustering making it but confusing.&lt;BR /&gt;Any experience with such case study,plz reply.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:55:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-tool-for-comparing-the-performance-of-media-and-feed/m-p/797589#M97344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manishkumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-10T17:55:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis tool for comparing the performance of media and feed for CHO cell</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-tool-for-comparing-the-performance-of-media-and-feed/m-p/797628#M97346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You might consider using a predictive model to explore the response surface. You might use a multiple linear regression model if the response is non-linear but with few modes. You could also use a Gaussian Process or Neural model. There are &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/18.1/#page/jmp/introduction-to-predictive-and-specialized-modeling.shtml#" target="_self"&gt;many more&lt;/A&gt; to try. You may use the &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/18.1/#page/jmp/introduction-to-profilers.shtml#" target="_self"&gt;Profiler&lt;/A&gt; with any JMP model to visualize the surface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you validated the data to look for data errors or explored the data for outliers that might be correct data but could distort a model?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-tool-for-comparing-the-performance-of-media-and-feed/m-p/797628#M97346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-10T20:25:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

