<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Suitability of %RSD as a response? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Suitability-of-RSD-as-a-response/m-p/795001#M97160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm performing DoE analysis where I have %RSD as a potential response. Is %RSD a suitable response factor? It's my understanding that derived values of two or more individual values may not be suitable since they are not in direct response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody have any experience or thoughts on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 09:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DoEDorkily123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-04T09:30:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suitability of %RSD as a response?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Suitability-of-RSD-as-a-response/m-p/795001#M97160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm performing DoE analysis where I have %RSD as a potential response. Is %RSD a suitable response factor? It's my understanding that derived values of two or more individual values may not be suitable since they are not in direct response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody have any experience or thoughts on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 09:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Suitability-of-RSD-as-a-response/m-p/795001#M97160</guid>
      <dc:creator>DoEDorkily123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T09:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suitability of %RSD as a response?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Suitability-of-RSD-as-a-response/m-p/795012#M97161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/53592"&gt;@DoEDorkily123&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: I assume you mean Relative Standard Deviation (100*[Sample SD/Sample Mean]). There is no reason it can't be a response. Generally speaking, any statistic (function of your data) could be a response. That said, RSD will not have a normal distribution; it tends to be skewed right so often a log (natural log) transformation is often used to make it approximately normal so that you can use the most common types of analyses (which assume normality); there is no guarantee that the log transformation will be appropriate (or even necessary), but in my experience it often is.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 09:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Suitability-of-RSD-as-a-response/m-p/795012#M97161</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T09:55:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

