<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P value in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793665#M97105</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/59827"&gt;@kowa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: JMP has no GOF test for these mixture models. And there are good reasons for this. See here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Goodness-of-Fit/td-p/229235" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Goodness-of-Fit/td-p/229235&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For a more complex explanation/discussion/alternative see here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0167947318301142" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0167947318301142&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.martinmodrak.cz/2018/05/14/identifying-non-identifiability/#:~:text=What%20is%20%E2%80%9Cnon%2Didentifiability%E2%80%9D,probability%20distribution%20of%20observed%20data" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.martinmodrak.cz/2018/05/14/identifying-non-identifiability/#:~:text=What%20is%20%E2%80%9Cnon%2Didentifiability%E2%80%9D,probability%20distribution%20of%20observed%20data&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 16:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-02T16:13:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P value</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793567#M97091</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bonjour, je suis noovice sur JMP et j'aimerais comprendre&amp;nbsp; Pourquoi JMP ne donne pas de p-value pour certaines distributions comme une loi normale d'ordre 2 ou 3?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Merci&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 09:39:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793567#M97091</guid>
      <dc:creator>kowa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T09:39:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P value</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793597#M97093</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/59827"&gt;@kowa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: Welcome to the community!&amp;nbsp; I'm not sure what you are asking. Do you mean to ask why there is no Goodness-of-fit Test for the "Normal 2 Mixture Distribution" or "Normal 3 Mixture Distribution" in the Distribution platform?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 10:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793597#M97093</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T10:21:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P value</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793660#M97103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7073"&gt;@MRB3855&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, that's my question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indeed when I have data adjustments that give me a lognormal distribution, I can have the P-value for&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Goodness-of-fit&lt;/SPAN&gt; but jmp does not propose this&amp;nbsp;if I have a normal distribution of order 2.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 15:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793660#M97103</guid>
      <dc:creator>kowa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T15:10:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P value</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793665#M97105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/59827"&gt;@kowa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: JMP has no GOF test for these mixture models. And there are good reasons for this. See here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Goodness-of-Fit/td-p/229235" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Goodness-of-Fit/td-p/229235&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For a more complex explanation/discussion/alternative see here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0167947318301142" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0167947318301142&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.martinmodrak.cz/2018/05/14/identifying-non-identifiability/#:~:text=What%20is%20%E2%80%9Cnon%2Didentifiability%E2%80%9D,probability%20distribution%20of%20observed%20data" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.martinmodrak.cz/2018/05/14/identifying-non-identifiability/#:~:text=What%20is%20%E2%80%9Cnon%2Didentifiability%E2%80%9D,probability%20distribution%20of%20observed%20data&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 16:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/P-value/m-p/793665#M97105</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-02T16:13:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

