<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is there a way to tell LCA that the rows are ordered by class? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-there-a-way-to-tell-LCA-that-the-rows-are-ordered-by-class/m-p/782064#M96527</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Typical dataset: 120-200 rows, 15 classes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rows are known to be ordered by class. What is unknown is where the 'fences' between classes are.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As-is -- i.e., without taking row order into account -- LCA correctly classifies about 94% of rows. My intuition is that if I knew how to tell the algorithm that the rows are grouped by class on input, we'd be at 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Visual, in case my use of 'grouped by' is unclear:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct would look like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;All 1a rows will always be neighbors in terms of row order, and all 1b, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, I sometimes get:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1c&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1c&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Potentially, I could make a column with Row() as the value, but my worry is that most of the clustering cols have 'class'-type values. For 15 classes, each col in use might have between 2-8 unique values. Row() will have 120 unique values, which feels like throwing a wildcard into the mix.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mtowle419</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-16T00:03:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a way to tell LCA that the rows are ordered by class?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-there-a-way-to-tell-LCA-that-the-rows-are-ordered-by-class/m-p/782064#M96527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Typical dataset: 120-200 rows, 15 classes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rows are known to be ordered by class. What is unknown is where the 'fences' between classes are.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As-is -- i.e., without taking row order into account -- LCA correctly classifies about 94% of rows. My intuition is that if I knew how to tell the algorithm that the rows are grouped by class on input, we'd be at 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Visual, in case my use of 'grouped by' is unclear:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct would look like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;All 1a rows will always be neighbors in terms of row order, and all 1b, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, I sometimes get:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1c&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1c&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Potentially, I could make a column with Row() as the value, but my worry is that most of the clustering cols have 'class'-type values. For 15 classes, each col in use might have between 2-8 unique values. Row() will have 120 unique values, which feels like throwing a wildcard into the mix.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-there-a-way-to-tell-LCA-that-the-rows-are-ordered-by-class/m-p/782064#M96527</guid>
      <dc:creator>mtowle419</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-16T00:03:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

