<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781752#M96463</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Well if I wager a guess it's because you removed them. &amp;nbsp;Here is the effect summary with your model (except I removed the D*D since it was aliased) before any terms are removed:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.25.00 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67142i467FFFF4CA4699EA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.25.00 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.25.00 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure what exactly you are doing, but I removed AE from the Effects Summary and here is the Interaction Profile. &amp;nbsp;Notice the AE interaction is greyed out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.28.18 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67143i7382996627A08792/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.28.18 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.28.18 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; What version JMP are you running?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:36:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-14T21:36:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781488#M96431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My question is how JMP controls the display of panels of Interaction Profiles plots that correspond to factors not included in the associated model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does JMP consistently display such panels differently from panels corresponding to factors that are included?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to distinguish factors included and omitted (within the model) on JMP Interaction Profiles. In my experience this operation is done automatically in some cases but not others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the first screenshot(1-No_distinction) I've&amp;nbsp; manually indicated the terms included in the model with asterisks (*).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JMP did not distinguish the display of the panels based on inclusion of factors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a different JMP workbook the plots corresponding to factors not included in the model are dashed lines and appear with dimmed intensity (2-With_distinction).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 11:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781488#M96431</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T11:46:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781501#M96432</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1-No_distinction" style="width: 786px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67119iF31ACE30B6B9208B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="1-No_distinction.png" alt="1-No_distinction" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;1-No_distinction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2-With_distinction" style="width: 700px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67120i4641BBE6F10C1455/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2-With_distinction.png" alt="2-With_distinction" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;2-With_distinction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;embedding screenshots instead of attaching&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 12:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781501#M96432</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T12:25:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781676#M96445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I may not understand your situation, but JMP will only give plots for the terms in the model. &amp;nbsp;If terms are confounded (aliased), then you will get dashed lines to indicate this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781676#M96445</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T17:17:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781679#M96446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you. In the top example, the three plots without asterisks are for interaction terms not in the model. Yet, they are not displayed in dashed lines. Could &amp;nbsp;you please elaborate on the aliasing of terms?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:28:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781679#M96446</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T17:28:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781681#M96447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you post your data table (anonymize it). &amp;nbsp;You should not be getting any plots for terms not in the model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If, for example, you run a fractional factorial design and do the analysis with a saturated model, the interaction plots will show dashes indicating there are aliased terms. &amp;nbsp;Here are the interaction plots from a 2^4-1 res IV experiment. &amp;nbsp;Since 2nd order effects are aliased, you see the dashed lines for the aliased interactions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 12.01.20 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67125iF28760483C71ACAC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 12.01.20 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 12.01.20 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781681#M96447</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:03:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781693#M96449</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The screenshot is from the top row (pertaining to factor "A") of the interaction profiler for the attached workbook – accessed via the embedded script Interaction Profiles. The script contains the model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only A*B and A*F are interaction terms included in the model for factor A. Yet, the interaction term plots are not greyed out or dashed for A*C and A*D nor A* E, as I have discussed in the preceding posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-08-14 14_43_04-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67126i3C86DE6EF4E0B103/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2024-08-14 14_43_04-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" alt="2024-08-14 14_43_04-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781693#M96449</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:49:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781724#M96458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you look at the Model it appears all 2nd order factor interactions are in your model. &amp;nbsp;Hence you will see the interactions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 2.39.18 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67138i7CFF6C1B8C291A94/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 2.39.18 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 2.39.18 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I modify your model with just AB and AF, this is what you get:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 2.40.18 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67139i0D9A876C1E8344B4/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 2.40.18 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 2.40.18 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781724#M96458</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T20:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781740#M96460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you! in response - can you please address why A*C-E do not appear in the Effect Summary?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I have intended in the model derivation/analysis was to include these terms initially, but then they were eliminated based on significance/contribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other &amp;nbsp;work, eliminated interaction terms not appearing in Effect Summary &amp;nbsp;are grayed out/dashed in Interaction Profiles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="capr_0-1723669050745.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67140i42680F3E4826D7D9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="capr_0-1723669050745.png" alt="capr_0-1723669050745.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781740#M96460</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T21:03:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781752#M96463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well if I wager a guess it's because you removed them. &amp;nbsp;Here is the effect summary with your model (except I removed the D*D since it was aliased) before any terms are removed:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.25.00 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67142i467FFFF4CA4699EA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.25.00 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.25.00 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure what exactly you are doing, but I removed AE from the Effects Summary and here is the Interaction Profile. &amp;nbsp;Notice the AE interaction is greyed out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.28.18 PM.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67143i7382996627A08792/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.28.18 PM.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 3.28.18 PM.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; What version JMP are you running?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:36:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781752#M96463</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T21:36:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781826#M96480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK -- the graying-out circumstance dependent on the inclusion status of interaction term is behaving as expected when I regenerate the model with all terms and then individually remove the undesired terms.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, in the initial script I shared, the display properties on the interaction plots are &lt;STRONG&gt;still unresponsive&lt;/STRONG&gt; to the removal of terms via the Effect Summary -- i.e., the inconsistency persists between Effect Summary and Interaction Profiler plotting properties in the initial script I shared.&amp;nbsp;I don’t believe we need a solution for this anomaly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running JMP 17.2. It is possible that the initial script I shared and am referring to was generated with JMP 16.2.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781826#M96480</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-15T11:22:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interaction Profiles - automated display of panels based on factor inclusion</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781994#M96515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4358"&gt;@statman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe to have uncovered the source of the inconsistency. I have reproducibly generated the following outcomes:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Outcome 1&lt;/U&gt;: Gray-out display properties as desired:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interaction Profiles must be “requested” in the JMP dialog via the drop-down for the Response as shown in the screenshot cursor:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-08-15 14_47_44-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" style="width: 528px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67183i372B0F1564B68E63/image-dimensions/528x245?v=v2" width="528" height="245" role="button" title="2024-08-15 14_47_44-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" alt="2024-08-15 14_47_44-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-08-15 14_55_51-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" style="width: 578px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67185iB7AA81D08727330B/image-dimensions/578x71?v=v2" width="578" height="71" role="button" title="2024-08-15 14_55_51-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" alt="2024-08-15 14_55_51-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Outcome 2&lt;/U&gt;: Gray-out display properties are &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; implemented, leading to inconsistency with respect to the terms included in the model:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interaction Profiles are “requested” in the JMP dialog via the drop-down for the Prediction Profiler, a sub-item of the Response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2024-08-15 14_48_50-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" style="width: 664px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/67184iDECF8BC6B3719F2A/image-dimensions/664x420?v=v2" width="664" height="420" role="button" title="2024-08-15 14_48_50-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" alt="2024-08-15 14_48_50-307_IP_upload - Fit Group - JMP Pro.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the screenshot for Outcome 2, it the AC AD AE plots are &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; grayed out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, both modes of Interaction Profile panels can be displayed simultaneously.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In summary to have the gray-out/dashed line display consistently dependent on the inclusion of respective interaction terms in the model the Interaction Profile panel apparently must be activated from the Factor Profiling menu for the Response.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 18:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interaction-Profiles-automated-display-of-panels-based-on-factor/m-p/781994#M96515</guid>
      <dc:creator>capr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-15T18:58:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

