<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777701#M95916</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Aside from the requested test, your residual plot suggests lack of fit. Could there be a non-linear effect in the residuals?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-31T14:04:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777584#M95899</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the residuals analysis, I evaluate normality and constant variance with the default graphs given in the regression analysis. However, I was wondering in which way I could test constant variance with a test that allow me to have sort of a p-value that make the situation more precise than looking at the graphs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am able to do it for normality, but not yet for the constance variance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example for the normality, I get the plot:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Julianveda_0-1722403343074.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/66656i4DB034520A08BFAE/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Julianveda_0-1722403343074.png" alt="Julianveda_0-1722403343074.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can give some conclusions visually, but I also like to have a more precise description of the situation and therefore, I save the residuals and using the distribution platform (fit normal) I can get:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Julianveda_1-1722403503546.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/66657iB89B1C65900BDD82/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Julianveda_1-1722403503546.png" alt="Julianveda_1-1722403503546.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;The shapiro-wilk test allow me to evaluate (in addition to the visual evaluation) the normality of my residuals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am now looking to do something similar (doing a test) for the constance variance of the residuals in addition to the residual vs predicted plot (that I add here below)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Julianveda_2-1722403806115.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/66658i6BF67EB382E1BFB6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Julianveda_2-1722403806115.png" alt="Julianveda_2-1722403806115.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that in the case of conducting an Anova in the "fit y by x" platform, there is the possibility of evaluating constance variance with "Lavene's test", but have not been able to do it in my case after plotting in this platform my saved&amp;nbsp; residuals and saved predicted values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know if there is a way in addition to the plot to test constance variance for my residuals ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any help,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Julian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777584#M95899</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julianveda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-31T06:45:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777620#M95901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think I found a nice tutorial from Professor Parris to do this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_j94LyurfU" target="_blank"&gt;Regression Diagnostics using JMP - Equality of Error Variance (youtube.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777620#M95901</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julianveda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-31T08:08:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777701#M95916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Aside from the requested test, your residual plot suggests lack of fit. Could there be a non-linear effect in the residuals?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/777701#M95916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-31T14:04:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/788122#M96957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5358"&gt;@Mark_Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; for your comment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you notice this in the residual by predicted plot or in the residual normal quantile plot ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/788122#M96957</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julianveda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-28T12:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/788201#M96961</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Did you notice this in the residual by predicted plot or in the residual normal quantile plot ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Your residual by predicted plot shows a curvature pattern. This is a strong evidence that one of the assumption behind the use of linear regression is not respected (errors should be normally distributed with random pattern, see &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_us/statistics-knowledge-portal/what-is-regression/simple-linear-regression-assumptions.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Regression Model Assumptions | Introduction to Statistics&lt;/A&gt;), and that you might be missing some effects in your model : quadratic effect(s) (or higher order terms), and/or any terms introducing curvature in the relationship between your response and the factors, like interaction terms.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;See more in the related posts :&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;LI-MESSAGE title="Interpretation related to response model (RSM)" uid="693177" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpretation-related-to-response-model-RSM/m-p/693177#U693177" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-forum-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-forum lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;LI-MESSAGE title="How I can I know if linear model or non-linear regression model fit to my variables?" uid="748518" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-I-can-I-know-if-linear-model-or-non-linear-regression-model/m-p/748518#U748518" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-forum-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-forum lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/788201#M96961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-28T13:47:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which test to evaluate the assumption of homegeneity of variances of residuals (apart from residual vs predicted plot) ?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/788230#M96964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11568"&gt;@Victor_G&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; for your reply,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I actually did the verification of residuals and performed a box cox transformation which improved the situation. I cannot really add more terms since we had a rather simple case with not too many degrees of freedom.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, your message allowed me to see the point in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5358"&gt;@Mark_Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;comment. I was forgetting that interactions and quadratic terms bring that non-linearity to the model if added after verification of residuals. A silly oversight from my part&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: S&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Which-test-to-evaluate-the-assumption-of-homegeneity-of/m-p/788230#M96964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julianveda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-28T14:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

