<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Standardization required in Multivariate? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Standardization-required-in-Multivariate/m-p/768154#M94838</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here are my thoughts:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Multivariate is typically done on the Y's (response variables), not the x's. &amp;nbsp;Now that doesn't mean you can't do both.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The way Mahalanobis works is to relate the values in each column to the values in other columns over the data set. &amp;nbsp;The analysis evaluates, in general, are you getting values reasonably close enough to typical values when the other columns are their respective levels. &amp;nbsp;If not, perhaps something unusual happened during that &lt;EM&gt;row&lt;/EM&gt;. &amp;nbsp;It is not specific as to which data points created the infraction. &amp;nbsp;Sometimes it's obvious which value was unusual, sometimes not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In any case, standardization of the values is not necessary.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-24T22:38:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Standardization required in Multivariate?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Standardization-required-in-Multivariate/m-p/768144#M94837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to perform an outlier analysis (Mahalanobis distance) in Multivariate. Do I need to standardize (normalize all values to the same scale, for example, -1 to 1) all values before executing the analysis, or does JMP do that for me automatically? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Standardization-required-in-Multivariate/m-p/768144#M94837</guid>
      <dc:creator>JZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-24T22:31:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standardization required in Multivariate?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Standardization-required-in-Multivariate/m-p/768154#M94838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here are my thoughts:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Multivariate is typically done on the Y's (response variables), not the x's. &amp;nbsp;Now that doesn't mean you can't do both.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The way Mahalanobis works is to relate the values in each column to the values in other columns over the data set. &amp;nbsp;The analysis evaluates, in general, are you getting values reasonably close enough to typical values when the other columns are their respective levels. &amp;nbsp;If not, perhaps something unusual happened during that &lt;EM&gt;row&lt;/EM&gt;. &amp;nbsp;It is not specific as to which data points created the infraction. &amp;nbsp;Sometimes it's obvious which value was unusual, sometimes not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In any case, standardization of the values is not necessary.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Standardization-required-in-Multivariate/m-p/768154#M94838</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-24T22:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

