https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/767079#M94725 <P><a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/8239">@JerryFish</a>&nbsp;,&nbsp;<a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5080">@DonMcCormack</a>&nbsp;Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you :)</img></P> Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:33:20 GMT cfs_analyst 2024-06-19T14:33:20Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/766800#M94681 <P>I have a reliability dataset where some of the readouts did not have any fails. Do I merge these readouts with the ones that have fails or include them separately?&nbsp;</P><P>Please refer to Setup1 Vs Setup2 in the snippet below [JMP file attached too]. Weibull alpha and beta parameters between Setup1 and Setup2 are drastically different. To me, setup2 seems reasonable since it includes complete information.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/65367i36AA7DDE835AB5C5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png" alt="cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png" /></span></P><P>&nbsp;</P> Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:30:18 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/766800#M94681 cfs_analyst 2024-06-18T14:30:18Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/767079#M94725 <P><a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/8239">@JerryFish</a>&nbsp;,&nbsp;<a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5080">@DonMcCormack</a>&nbsp;Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you :)</img></P> Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:33:20 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/767079#M94725 cfs_analyst 2024-06-19T14:33:20Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/767110#M94732 <P>This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.</P> Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:26:57 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Frequency-0-in-Life-Distribution-Platform-in-Reliability/m-p/767110#M94732 cfs_analyst 2024-06-19T16:26:57Z