<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Statistical relevent sampling plan for powders, 1000-2000 g in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752706#M93431</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/33497"&gt;@lehaofeng&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4358"&gt;@statman&lt;/a&gt;. Makes sense. I asked the same questions early on before I started writing the protocol but was told that we didn't want to spend the extra money for now. I let the experts decide how we want to sample and the sampling plan direction they were ok with I mentioned in my OP. Might be from their past experience. Looks like I will have to accept it for now and hopefully be able to convince them later when the processes are optimized and revalidated. Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 16:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MakeUWanna_JMP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-07T16:46:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Statistical relevent sampling plan for powders, 1000-2000 g</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752505#M93398</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My company recently purchased licenses for JMP and currently running 17.2.0. I have been tasked to write a PQ on a couple of our powder manufacturing processes. I have been told to use a statistically relevant sampling plan and one of the engineers pointed me to the JMP sampling plan add-in but I don't think its the right add-in to use for powders. It seems like a statistical plan for sampling items, e.g. bolts. I wanted to use a similar add-in for about 1000-2000g of powders. The JMP sampling add-in for variable sampling when used recommends 3 samples per lot and we double to 6 samples for assurance which may be good enough but the statistical justification isn't there. We usually tray dry in 1-6 trays depending on process and amount. Our current sampling practice for lot release testing is pulling one 3 g sample but this doesn't seem like a statistically relevant sample for uniformity. We don't want to change the procedure to add a mixing step and then pull a sample, and would rather prove that the powder is homogenous by pulling several random samples. i just don't know how many is relevant.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752505#M93398</guid>
      <dc:creator>MakeUWanna_JMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-07T00:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statistical relevent sampling plan for powders, 1000-2000 g</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752516#M93399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the purpose of your sampling?&lt;BR /&gt;Is it to prove that the powder is acceptable?&lt;BR /&gt;Or is the powder uniform?&lt;BR /&gt;Or both?&lt;BR /&gt;If you want to prove that the powder is homogeneous, then you need to define the homogeneity difference, as well as determine the sampling point location, which statistics can't tell you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 01:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752516#M93399</guid>
      <dc:creator>lehaofeng</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-07T01:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statistical relevent sampling plan for powders, 1000-2000 g</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752626#M93419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Similar to the previous response, there is not enough information (what is known about the powder? mean, variation, consistency). &amp;nbsp;I believe the question is: how to get a representative sample? &amp;nbsp;You must think about the different components of variation. &amp;nbsp;For example, measurement system, within tray, between tray, within lot, between lot, etc. &amp;nbsp;What are the possible sources of variation (hypotheses about factors that affect the powder)? &amp;nbsp;How do you ensure these vary in your sample? &amp;nbsp;These are not statistical questions. &amp;nbsp;You need SME to help decide what a representative sample is. &amp;nbsp;It is not a question of sample size, but how the sample is acquired.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 14:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752626#M93419</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-07T14:01:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statistical relevent sampling plan for powders, 1000-2000 g</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752706#M93431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/33497"&gt;@lehaofeng&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4358"&gt;@statman&lt;/a&gt;. Makes sense. I asked the same questions early on before I started writing the protocol but was told that we didn't want to spend the extra money for now. I let the experts decide how we want to sample and the sampling plan direction they were ok with I mentioned in my OP. Might be from their past experience. Looks like I will have to accept it for now and hopefully be able to convince them later when the processes are optimized and revalidated. Thanks again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 16:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Statistical-relevent-sampling-plan-for-powders-1000-2000-g/m-p/752706#M93431</guid>
      <dc:creator>MakeUWanna_JMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-07T16:46:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

