topic Re: Proper labels without stacking in Discussions

Proper labels without stacking

MichaH — Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:57:10 GMT

Hello,

how can I get proper labels for data without stacking. I cannot stack as I need to see rows dependencies, but on the other hand side need to have for each category only relevant data. I attached also the file.

Re: Proper labels without stacking

jthi — Fri, 26 Jan 2024 12:03:38 GMT

What are "proper labels" in this case?

Re: Proper labels without stacking

MichaH — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:39:51 GMT

Hi, please see attached.

Re: Proper labels without stacking

MichaH — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:20:37 GMT

See here stacked...

Re: Proper labels without stacking

jthi — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:01:33 GMT

One option is to add new column which has the row numbers and then use that as overlay for float type of bar charts and enable labels on those. Then use customize to make those "bar charts" smaller and hide extra values from legend. (This is is very annoying to do though)

Re: Proper labels without stacking

MichaH — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:08:42 GMT

Hi, can you please show me how please?

Re: Proper labels without stacking

jthi — Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:04:00 GMT

Here is a script which should create the graph (mostly, it doesn't fix legend)

Names Default To Here(1);

dt = Open("$DOWNLOADS/Points.jmp");
dt << Clear Row States; // to remove labels

new_col = dt << New Column("Row", Numeric, Ordinal, Formula(Row()));

new_col << Suppress Eval(1);


gb = dt << Graph Builder(
	Size(1076, 744),
	Show Control Panel(0),
	Variables(Y(:VA), Y(:WA), Group X(:Type), Overlay(:Row)),
	Elements(
		Position(1, 1),
		Box Plot(Y, Overlay(0), Legend(8)),
		Points(Y, Overlay(0), Legend(10)),
		Bar(Y, Legend(12), Bar Style("Float"), Label("Label by Value"))
	),
	Elements(
		Position(1, 2),
		Box Plot(Y, Overlay(0), Legend(9)),
		Points(Y, Overlay(0), Legend(11)),
		Bar(Y, Legend(13), Bar Style("Float"), Label("Label by Value"))
	),
	SendToReport(
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"Graph Builder",
			FrameBox,
			{DispatchSeg(BarSeg(1), {Set Width Proportion(0.00005)})}
		),
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"Graph Builder",
			FrameBox(2),
			{DispatchSeg(BarSeg(1), {Set Width Proportion(0.000001)})}
		),
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"Graph Builder",
			FrameBox(3),
			{DispatchSeg(BarSeg(1), {Set Width Proportion(0.000001)})}
		),
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"Graph Builder",
			FrameBox(4),
			{DispatchSeg(BarSeg(1), {Set Width Proportion(0.000001)})}
		),
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"Graph Builder",
			FrameBox(5),
			{DispatchSeg(BarSeg(1), {Set Width Proportion(0.000001)})}
		),
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"Graph Builder",
			FrameBox(6),
			{DispatchSeg(BarSeg(1), {Set Width Proportion(0.000001)})}
		),
		Dispatch(
			{},
			"400",
			LegendBox,
			{Legend Position(
				{8, [0, -3], 10, [2], 12, [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
				19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26], 9, [1, -3], 11, [3], 13, [-3, -3, -3, -3, -3,
				-3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3, -3]}
			)}
		)
	)
);

Important things are setting variables for graph builder

and customizing each bar segments width proportion to be much smaller

and you end up with

and if you need classification I would maybe consider modifying the marker

Re: Proper labels without stacking

MichaH — Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:25:48 GMT

Thank you a lot despite I was not able to replicate.