<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Paired-samples test of equivalence in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/717799#M89949</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, this way is still the most appropriate method using JMP 17..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Equivalence testing has been added to Matched Pairs in JMP 18, which will be out in a couple of months. You won't have to calculate the difference prior to launching the platform. There is no preparation of the data required. Also, it provides a richer set of tests and a non-parametric form. The reporting is richer, too, consistent with recent additions of equivalence tests in other platforms.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-18T16:40:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Paired-samples test of equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/578851#M78619</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible within JMP Pro to perform a&amp;nbsp;paired-samples test of equivalence? I can only see an option under the Fit Y by X platform to carry out an equivalence test without a grouping variable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/578851#M78619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired-samples test of equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/578864#M78620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You generally use the Analyze &amp;gt; Specialized Modeling &amp;gt; Matched Pairs for this purpose, but this platform does not currently provide an equivalence test. For now, use a formula to compute the difference in the data table. I mocked up paired responses Y1 and Y2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="table.PNG" style="width: 721px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/48034i53371EB16319F172/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="table.PNG" alt="table.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Select Analyze &amp;gt; Distribution and launch it with Difference in the Y role. Click the red triangle next to Difference and select Test Equivalence:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="menu.PNG" style="width: 451px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/48035iF6BCBDECFF8F89D4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="menu.PNG" alt="menu.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Specify 0 for the expected mean and whatever limit you use for practical equivalence. I claim that my example is equivalent if the result is within 1 unit:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="dialog.PNG" style="width: 358px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/48036i0EB05E504D3D290D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="dialog.PNG" alt="dialog.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Click OK, and you will get the result:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="result.PNG" style="width: 703px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/48037i9475F5D2CE9C5152/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="result.PNG" alt="result.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This example shows that these two responses are practically equivalent because the two-sided tests are significant and the confidence interval estimate of the mean is entirely within the +/- 1 interval specified.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/578864#M78620</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-08T14:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired-samples test of equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/578894#M78622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much, that's so helpful!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 15:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/578894#M78622</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-08T15:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired-samples test of equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/717766#M89943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this still the appropriate method for doing a paired TOST or is there new capability in JMP 17?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stephanie&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/717766#M89943</guid>
      <dc:creator>SLO11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-18T13:03:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired-samples test of equivalence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/717799#M89949</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, this way is still the most appropriate method using JMP 17..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Equivalence testing has been added to Matched Pairs in JMP 18, which will be out in a couple of months. You won't have to calculate the difference prior to launching the platform. There is no preparation of the data required. Also, it provides a richer set of tests and a non-parametric form. The reporting is richer, too, consistent with recent additions of equivalence tests in other platforms.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Paired-samples-test-of-equivalence/m-p/717799#M89949</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-18T16:40:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

