<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 80% z-value : 1.3? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/80-z-value-1-3/m-p/697310#M88286</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/39897"&gt;@MikeKim&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: The 1.282 is correct for a one-sided 90% interval. And the z-value for a one-sided 90% bound is the same as the z-value for an 80% two-sided interval. So, while the page you reference is not worded very well (and exposes other issues that may be debated), a one-sided bound is appropriate for setting release limits (for a one-sided spec), and 1.282 is the right number for a 90% one-sided bound. For clarity, It should have been written referencing a one-sided bound (90%) rather than two-sided interval (80%), even though the z-value is the same.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For more detail on this broad subject:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-b8d8-b1db917c908e/PT1018_PeerReview.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-b8d8-b1db917c908e/PT1018_PeerReview.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-13T10:11:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>80% z-value : 1.3?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/80-z-value-1-3/m-p/697217#M88273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MikeKim_0-1699837785773.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/58603iDDCDABDF95FABA08/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MikeKim_0-1699837785773.png" alt="MikeKim_0-1699837785773.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, above is the 415page of Pharmaceutical Quality by Desing Using JMP.&lt;BR /&gt;In above 90% at the last line is the Spec limit (LSL).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am confusing the 1.3 looks like ensuring 90% Confidence. (1.282)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone say that using 1.3 and this is 80% confidence?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am sorry for the confusing question and many, but please help me.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 01:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/80-z-value-1-3/m-p/697217#M88273</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeKim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T01:28:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 80% z-value : 1.3?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/80-z-value-1-3/m-p/697310#M88286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/39897"&gt;@MikeKim&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: The 1.282 is correct for a one-sided 90% interval. And the z-value for a one-sided 90% bound is the same as the z-value for an 80% two-sided interval. So, while the page you reference is not worded very well (and exposes other issues that may be debated), a one-sided bound is appropriate for setting release limits (for a one-sided spec), and 1.282 is the right number for a 90% one-sided bound. For clarity, It should have been written referencing a one-sided bound (90%) rather than two-sided interval (80%), even though the z-value is the same.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For more detail on this broad subject:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-b8d8-b1db917c908e/PT1018_PeerReview.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-b8d8-b1db917c908e/PT1018_PeerReview.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 10:11:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/80-z-value-1-3/m-p/697310#M88286</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-13T10:11:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

