<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pairwise comparisons repeated measures MANOVA? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/pairwise-comparisons-repeated-measures-MANOVA/m-p/659383#M84862</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/39662"&gt;@ContentMachine2&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;why not try using the mixed model approach? i would start here: &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Full-Factorial-Repeated-Measures-ANOVA-Add-In/ta-p/23904" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Full-Factorial-Repeated-Measures-ANOVA-Add-In/ta-p/23904&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;there you can get all the different contrasts you like and i find it more intuitive for testing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;let us know if it works.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ron_horne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-17T19:04:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pairwise comparisons repeated measures MANOVA?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/pairwise-comparisons-repeated-measures-MANOVA/m-p/659270#M84855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using MANOVA for repeated measures, is there a way to get pairwise results from the different levels of a model effect (analogous to how the post-hoc student's |t| and tukey's HSD can do in the least squares models)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alternatively, is there a simpler way other than to drop-out a model effect level (i.e. 'hide and exclude') and rerun the model in order determine the relative effects of the different levels?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;using JMP 17.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:12:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/pairwise-comparisons-repeated-measures-MANOVA/m-p/659270#M84855</guid>
      <dc:creator>ContentMachine2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T16:12:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pairwise comparisons repeated measures MANOVA?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/pairwise-comparisons-repeated-measures-MANOVA/m-p/659383#M84862</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/39662"&gt;@ContentMachine2&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;why not try using the mixed model approach? i would start here: &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Full-Factorial-Repeated-Measures-ANOVA-Add-In/ta-p/23904" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Full-Factorial-Repeated-Measures-ANOVA-Add-In/ta-p/23904&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;there you can get all the different contrasts you like and i find it more intuitive for testing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;let us know if it works.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/pairwise-comparisons-repeated-measures-MANOVA/m-p/659383#M84862</guid>
      <dc:creator>ron_horne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T19:04:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

