<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Reliability Forecast in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Reliability-Forecast/m-p/640771#M83805</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for bringing this to my attention!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bayesian model shouldn't have been available in Reliability Forecast. It is not wired into the list of "Choose Distribution". I will put this for future consideration. So, it is not possible now for your first question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't have a recommendation, but maybe some thoughts on a couple of scenarios.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, if you have sufficient amount of data, i.e., return counts, non-Bayesian estimate should have given good predictions. If you have sufficient data, and also a strong prior, I suspect there will be a good chance the information conflicts. Then a question will be which to trust, data or prior? So I would prefer not using Bayesian model if there are sufficient return counts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, if you don't have sufficient return counts, and you are interested in future return counts from what are still running. The last resort now is do-it-yourself by using simulation. That is what is done in the software as well. You need to check out one of the two resources, whichever is available to you:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, by Meeker and Escobar, 1998. Chapter 12.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, 2nd ed., by Meeker and Escobar and Pascual, 2022. Chapter 15.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 13:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>peng_liu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-09T13:16:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Reliability Forecast</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Reliability-Forecast/m-p/640113#M83754</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to predict warranty returns but want to use the Bayesian estimation tools to update the warranty predictions. No matter what I do I can’t seem to get the warranty predictions to update after applying a Bayesian model. Is it possible to use the Bayesian tools with Reliability Forecast? If not, how would you recommend going about adjusting those return predictions for the updated posterior parameters?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 19:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Reliability-Forecast/m-p/640113#M83754</guid>
      <dc:creator>AcceptanceGnu69</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-07T19:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reliability Forecast</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Reliability-Forecast/m-p/640771#M83805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for bringing this to my attention!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bayesian model shouldn't have been available in Reliability Forecast. It is not wired into the list of "Choose Distribution". I will put this for future consideration. So, it is not possible now for your first question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't have a recommendation, but maybe some thoughts on a couple of scenarios.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, if you have sufficient amount of data, i.e., return counts, non-Bayesian estimate should have given good predictions. If you have sufficient data, and also a strong prior, I suspect there will be a good chance the information conflicts. Then a question will be which to trust, data or prior? So I would prefer not using Bayesian model if there are sufficient return counts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, if you don't have sufficient return counts, and you are interested in future return counts from what are still running. The last resort now is do-it-yourself by using simulation. That is what is done in the software as well. You need to check out one of the two resources, whichever is available to you:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, by Meeker and Escobar, 1998. Chapter 12.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, 2nd ed., by Meeker and Escobar and Pascual, 2022. Chapter 15.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 13:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Reliability-Forecast/m-p/640771#M83805</guid>
      <dc:creator>peng_liu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T13:16:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

