<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interpreting Pairwise Tukey HSD t ratio in Zero-Inflated Poisson in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpreting-Pairwise-Tukey-HSD-t-ratio-in-Zero-Inflated-Poisson/m-p/622346#M82136</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The context of my data is from an e-commerce website. I am measuring the number of errors made based on different independent variables: Filtering technique (Alphabetical, Relevance and Search) and Number of Items added (Add one at a time, or add multiple items to cart at once). As the number of errors made is 0 most of the time, I have opted to use the Zero Inflated Poisson Regression. When I performed the pairwise Tukey HSD comparison, I get the following picture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I interpret the t ratio and p values in this case? For example, for Filtering Technique = Alphabetical and Number of Items added = Multiple, vs Filtering Technique = Search and Number of Items Added = Multiple, t ratio is -3.28 and p=0.0143. Does this mean that Search,Multiple number of items added has a higher significance of errors than Alphabetical,Multiple number of items added (since t is negative)? This seems to contradict the data I have, where there there is no errors made in the scenario where filtering technique is search and there are multiple number of modules added&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;turkey hsd pairwise tests&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ConstructChart2_0-1681414901894.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51952iC3C376D1B2BBBA4C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ConstructChart2_0-1681414901894.png" alt="ConstructChart2_0-1681414901894.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Distribution of data (Alphabetical, Multiple)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ConstructChart2_1-1681415087104.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51953i72EC68F8C7061DE7/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ConstructChart2_1-1681415087104.png" alt="ConstructChart2_1-1681415087104.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Distribution of Data (Search, Multiple). Note there are 0 errors made&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ConstructChart2_2-1681415116602.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51954i6D6175246A5003BA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ConstructChart2_2-1681415116602.png" alt="ConstructChart2_2-1681415116602.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ConstructChart2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-10T20:54:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interpreting Pairwise Tukey HSD t ratio in Zero-Inflated Poisson</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpreting-Pairwise-Tukey-HSD-t-ratio-in-Zero-Inflated-Poisson/m-p/622346#M82136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The context of my data is from an e-commerce website. I am measuring the number of errors made based on different independent variables: Filtering technique (Alphabetical, Relevance and Search) and Number of Items added (Add one at a time, or add multiple items to cart at once). As the number of errors made is 0 most of the time, I have opted to use the Zero Inflated Poisson Regression. When I performed the pairwise Tukey HSD comparison, I get the following picture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I interpret the t ratio and p values in this case? For example, for Filtering Technique = Alphabetical and Number of Items added = Multiple, vs Filtering Technique = Search and Number of Items Added = Multiple, t ratio is -3.28 and p=0.0143. Does this mean that Search,Multiple number of items added has a higher significance of errors than Alphabetical,Multiple number of items added (since t is negative)? This seems to contradict the data I have, where there there is no errors made in the scenario where filtering technique is search and there are multiple number of modules added&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;turkey hsd pairwise tests&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ConstructChart2_0-1681414901894.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51952iC3C376D1B2BBBA4C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ConstructChart2_0-1681414901894.png" alt="ConstructChart2_0-1681414901894.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Distribution of data (Alphabetical, Multiple)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ConstructChart2_1-1681415087104.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51953i72EC68F8C7061DE7/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ConstructChart2_1-1681415087104.png" alt="ConstructChart2_1-1681415087104.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Distribution of Data (Search, Multiple). Note there are 0 errors made&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ConstructChart2_2-1681415116602.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51954i6D6175246A5003BA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ConstructChart2_2-1681415116602.png" alt="ConstructChart2_2-1681415116602.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpreting-Pairwise-Tukey-HSD-t-ratio-in-Zero-Inflated-Poisson/m-p/622346#M82136</guid>
      <dc:creator>ConstructChart2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T20:54:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

